‘Tetrachordon’ was not better abused; but Milton
's assailants were unorganized, and were obliged each to print and pay for his own dingy little quarto, trusting to the natural laws of demand and supply to furnish him with readers.
was arraigned by the constituted authorities of literary justice.
They might be, nay, they were Jeffrieses and Scroggses, but the sentence was published, and the penalty inflicted before all England
The difference between his fortune and Milton
's was that between being pelted by a mob of personal enemies and being set in the pillory.
In the first case, the annoyance brushes off mostly with the mud; in the last, there is no solace but the consciousness of suffering in a great cause.
This solace, to a certain extent, Keats
had; for his ambition was noble, and he hoped not to make a great reputation, but to be a great poet.
says that Wordsworth
were the only men he had ever seen who looked conscious of a lofty purpose.
It is curious that men should resent more fiercely what they suspect to be good verses, than what they know to be bad morals.
Is it because they feel themselves incapable of the one and not of the other?
Probably a certain amount of honest loyalty to old idols in danger of dethronement is to be taken into account, and quite as much of the cruelty of criticism is due to want of thought as to deliberate injustice.
However it be, the best poetry has been the most savagely attacked, and men who scrupulously practised the Ten Commandments as if there were never a not
in any of them, felt every sentiment of their better nature outraged by the ‘Lyrical Ballads
It is idle to attempt to show that Keats
did not suffer keenly from the vulgarities of Blackwood
and the Quarterly.
He suffered in proportion as his ideal was high, and he was conscious of falling below it. In England
, especially, it is not