I said that Margaret had a broad good sense, which brought her near to all people.
I am to say that she had also a strong temperament, which is that counter force which makes individuality, by driving all the powers in the direction of the ruling thought or feeling, and, when it is allowed full sway, isolating them.
These two tendencies were always invading each other, and now one and now the other carried the day. This alternation perplexes the biographer, as it did the observer.
We contradict on the second page what we affirm on the first: and I remember how often I was compelled to correct my impressions of her character when living; for after I had settled it once for all that she wanted this or that perception, at our next interview she would say with emphasis the very word.
I think, in her case, there was something abnormal in those obscure habits and necessities which we denote by the word Temperament.
In the first days of our acquaintance, I felt her to be a foreigner,—that, with her, one would always be sensible of some barrier, as if in making up a friendship with a cultivated Spaniard or Turk
She had a strong constitution, and of course its reactions were strong; and this is the reason why in all her life she has so much to say of her fate
. She was in jubilant spirits in the morning, and ended the day with nervous headache, whose spasms, my wife told me, produced total prostration.
She had great energy of speech and action, and seemed formed for high emergencies.
Her life concentrated itself on certain happy days,