the fosterer, the sole supporter of the slave-trade.
It creates the demand for slaves, and the foreign supply will always be equal to the demand of consumption.
It keeps the market open.
It offers inducements to the slave-trader which no severity of law against his traffic can overcome.
By our laws his trade is piracy; while slavery, to which alone it owes its existence, is protected and cherished, and those engaged in it are rewarded by an increase of political power proportioned to the increase of their stock of human beings!
To steal the natives of Africa
is a crime worthy of an ignominious death; but to steal and enslave annually nearly one hundred thousand of the descendants of these stolen natives, born in this country, is considered altogether excusable and proper!
For my own part, I know no difference between robbery in Africa
and robbery at home.
I could with as quiet a conscience engage in the one as the other.
‘There is not one general principle
,’ justly remarks Lord Nugent, ‘on which the slave-trade is to be stigmatized which does not impeach slavery itself.’
Kindred in iniquity, both must fall speedily, fall together, and be consigned to the same dishonorable grave.
The spirit which is thrilling through every nerve of England
is awakening America
from her sleep of death.
Who, among our statesmen, would not shrink from the baneful reputation of having supported by his legislative influence the slave-trade, the traffic in human flesh?
Let them then beware; for the time is near at hand when the present defenders of slavery will sink under the same fatal reputation, and