in the aged Sir Edward Coke
, who now expiated the
sins of his early ambition by devotion to the interests of the people.
It was in vain that the patentees relinquished a part of their pretensions; the commons
resolved that English fishermen shall have fishing pith al. its incidents.
‘Your patents’—thus Gorges
was addressed by Coke
from the speaker's chair— ‘contains many particulars contrary to the laws and privileges of the subject; it is a monopoly, and the ends of private gain are concealed under color of planting a colony.’
‘Shall none,’ observed the veteran lawyer in debate, ‘shall none visit the seacoast for fishing?
This is to make a monopoly upon the seas, which wont to be free.
If you alone are to pack and dry fish, you attempt a monopoly of the wind and the sun.’
It was in vain for Sir George Calvert
The bill passed without amendment, though it never received the royal assent.1
The determined opposition of the house, though it could not move the king to overthrow the corporation, paralyzed its enterprise; many of the patentees abandoned their interest; so that the Plymouth company now did little except issue grants of domains; and the cottages, which, within a few years, were sprinkled along the coast from Cape Cod
to the Bay of Fundy
, were the consequence of private adventure.
The territory between the River of Salem
and the Kennebec
became, in a great measure, the property of two enterprising individuals.
We have seen that Martin Pring
was the discoverer of New Hampshire