Britain, by the acts of trade, had all from the colonies
before, and could but drive them to observe the strictest maxims of frugality, and to establish manufactures of leather, cotton, wool, and flax; that they were not consistent with charters, which were the original compacts between the first emigrants to America
and the crown; that they were against all precedents of the previous legislation of the British parliament; that they were equally against the precedents of legislation for Ireland
, which was as subject to Great Britain
as were the colonies; that they were against the judgment of former British ministers, whose requisitions for revenue were uniformly transmitted to the colonies to tax themselves.
‘There may be a time,’ he added, ‘when redress may be obtained.
Till then, I shall recommend a legal, orderly, and prudent resentment to be expressed in a zealous and vigorous industry.
A garment of linsey-woolsey, when made the distinction of patriotism, is more honorable than the plumes and the diadem of an emperor without it. Let the manufacture of America
be the symbol of dignity and the badge of virtue, and it will soon break the fetters of distress.’
Thus wrote Dulany
, the champion of the day, pleading, not for truths pregnant with independence, but for exemption from taxes imposed without consent; promoting repeal, but beating back revolution.
His opinions were thought to have moulded those of William Pitt
, by whom they were publicly1
noticed with great honor; and they widely prevailed in America
‘This unconstitutional method of taxation,’ observed Washington
, at Mount Vernon
, of the Stamp Act,