chap. VIII.} 1763. Aug.
This text is part of:
Table of Contents:
1 For the king's account of this interview to Grenville, in Grenville's Diary, 197, 199; to Hertford in Walpole's George III. i. 291; to Sandwich, in Sandwich to Bedford, and in Bedford to Neville, in Bedford Cor. III. 238, 241. For Pitt's account to Wood, see Wood's Letter, in the Chatham Correspondence; to Hardwicke, in Hardwicke to Royston, Harris III. 377, 380; to the House of Commons, in Walpole, i. 318, 319, and in several contemporary letters, containing the accounts of the debates.Pitt had no good reason to think the king intended to accept his terms, appears also from his own account of it, as reported by Hardwicke. Bute, in his interview, wished at first to keep it a secret one. Then openness was pushed to an extreme. Pitt's summons to court was an unsealed note, as little confidential as a Lord Chamberlain's card of invitation. When Pitt named names, the king asked him to write them down, which Pitt declined to do. Some of Pitt's suggestions were so offensive to the king, that while he said he liked to hear him, and bade him go on, he yet said ‘now and then’ that is repeatedly that his honor must be consulted. Surely to describe the acceptance of a proposition as inconsistent with honor, would seem not to be an encouragement that it would be accepted.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.