over her colonies.’
‘It is not very probable
that they will ever voluntarily submit to us; the blood which must be shed in forcing them to do so is every drop of it the blood of those who are or of those whom we wish to have for our fellow citizens.’
‘They are very weak who flatter themselves that in the state to which things are come, our colonies will be easily conquered by force alone.’
And he pointed out the vast immediate and continuing advantages which Great Britain
would derive, if she ‘should voluntarily give up all authority over her colonies, and leave them to elect their own magistrates, to enact their own laws, and to make peace and war as they might think proper.’
, an English royalist writer on political economy, had studied perseveringly the laws of nature, which are the laws of God, in their application to commerce; and at the risk of being rated a visionary enthusiast, he now sought to convince the landed gentry, that Great Britain
would lose nothing if she should renounce her colonies and cultivate commerce with them as an independent nation.
This he enforced with such strength of argument and perspicuity of statement, that Soame Jenyns wrote verses in his praise, and Mansfield
approved his treatise.
Thus rose through the clouds of conflict and passion the cheering idea, that the impending change, which had been deprecated as the ruin of the empire, would bring no disaster to Britain.
American statesmen had struggled to avoid a separation, which neither the indefatigable zeal of Samuel Adams
, nor the eloquence of John Adams
, nor the sympathetic spirit of Jefferson
, could have brought about.