līcað leng swā wēl. Unless wēl is a mere scribal blunder for sēl, the positive may be due to a contamination of two constructions, viz. līcað wēl, and līca*eth; leng swā sēl (bet); cp. 2423. See B.-T.: swā, iv 5; Angl. xxvii 426.
This text is part of:
Table of Contents:
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.