amount furnished being metered.
Our partial ownership insures us a perpetual supply of water.
The city now owns its own water works free from debt, and there is no reason why that condition cannot continue.
This favorable state of affairs is due to Mr. Frank E. Chandler
more than to any other one man, for, against the opposition of the State
and the City of Boston
and the opposition of influential men of Malden
, and even of some within our own city, he maintained his position in the suit for proper recompense for the taking of our property by the Metropolitan district.
Probably nothing in this vicinity has been the cause of so much litigation as the waters of Spot Pond
October 26, 1871, in order to avoid trouble with the former owners of the water from the pond (the mill owners located along Spot Pond brook
, acting together, formally took the outlet of the pond, that they might control the flow.
In January, 1872, the mill owners brought suit for damages for the taking mentioned, which deprived them of water, and after a hard fought legal battle got judgment and were paid.
's share of the expenses of these suits was $33,154.58.
Being petitioned by the abutters on the pond because of the overflowing of their lands, the Superior Court appointed commissioners to determine high-water mark at the pond, which they did in 1876, and caused a copper bolt to be set in a ledge at the shore, indicating the same.
They also fixed low-water mark at 7.91 feet below that point.
The records show that, as early as 1700, there was objection made to the overflowing of the land about the pond, caused by the dam put in by the mill owners on the brook; but the mill owners maintained the dam, sometimes with a shotgun.
The Governor and council were petitioned for viewers to examine the pond, which petition was granted, resulting in an agreement as to