previous next

Confederate States District Court.

--The Grand Jury, which met yesterday, is composed as follows: D. A. Wilson, Lynchburg, foreman: T. M. Keller, Wm Cox, Charlottesville; T. Brown Dean, Lynchburg; B. B. Moseley, W. J. Baker,. Norfolk City; James Jarvis, Portsmouth; J. W. Sener, B. E. Gill, Fredericksburg: Dr. R. T. Taylor, John W. Lane, Amelia; Egbert G. Lee, Powhatan; Dr. Thomas P. Atkinson, Danville; Wm. A. Armistead,Robt. A. Pollard R. H. Lorton, Wm. P. Ragland, Thaddeus B. Starke, E. M. Porter, A. M. Bailey, R. M. Allen, Peter D. McKinney, John H. Leftwich, Richmond.

Judge Halyburton charged the Grand Jury as follows:

Gentlemen of the Grand Jury:

The 13th clause of the 7th section of the 1st article of the Provisional Constitution of the Confederate States, in pursuance of which you are now assembled, declared, in the exact words of the Constitution of the United States, that ‘"no person shall be held to answer for a capital or otherwise infamous crime, unless on the presentment of the Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia when in service in time of war or public danger."’

The only authority possessed by the Courts of the Confederate States to take cognizance of any offence is bestowed by the Constitution of the Confederate States, and acts of Congress made in pursuance of powers therein granted.

You have, therefore, no such general authority to inquire into offences against the laws of the State, or against good morals, or good order, as is possessed by Grand Juries in the State Courts.

You have, in general, to deal only with those crimes and misdemeanors which are declared to be such by the Constitution or laws of the Confederate States; or by statutes or laws of a State or of the United States, which were adopted by the Congress of the Confederate States. The 37th section of the act passed by the Congress of the Confederate States, and approved on the 16th of March, 1861, provides that ‘"the laws of the United States in regard to crimes and offences"’ shall ‘"be in force until otherwise provided by law of Congress."’

Thus, the criminal laws of the United States having been expressly adopted by Congress, became laws of the Confederate States--that is to say, those laws of the United States which were passed before the act aforesaid.

Under these laws of the United States and the criminal laws of the Confederate States, you may inquire into and present a great number of different offences, a few of which I will mention — murder, manslaughter on the high seas, or in bays or rivers where the tide ebbs and flows, committed on board of ships or other vessels belonging to the Confederacy; mutiny or revolt committed on board of such vessels; cruelty to seamen; stealing or taking letters from the mail or post-office; and counterfeiting and forgery of various kinds, fall under your cognizance.

To forge the Treasury notes of the Confederate States has been deemed by Congress a crime so high in its character, and so extremely mischievous in its consequences, that it was thought necessary to make it punishable with death. Even to pass, utter, or publish as true, any forged Treasury note, knowing it to be forged, is punishable in the same way.

Treason is another offence to which I will call your attention. By the third section of the third article of the Constitution of the Confederate States, which is copied, with the substitution of the word ‘"Confederate"’ for the word ‘"United,"’ from the Constitution of the United States. ‘"Treason against the Confederate States shall consist only in levying was against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort;"’ and ‘"no person shall be convicted of treason unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on confession in open court."’

To adhere to the enemies of the Confederate States, giving them aid and comfort in any way in carrying on war against us, is therefore, as you see, as much treason as to be actually engaged in the war.

The Constitution declares that ‘"Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech or of the press;"’ and mere words, whether written or spoken, can never amount to treason, unless they are intended to give, or do give, in some way, aid to the enemy in carrying on the war.

To give to the enemy information as to the number of our troops, or the position or movements of our army, or any other information which would be of service to him in the conduct of the war, would be treason.

To trade with the enemy, too, may be treasonable. Such traffic, if not always treason, is generally a high misdemeanor, at least it subjects the party engaged in it, to a forfeiture of the vessel and cargo, or other property that may be employed in it, unless it be carried on with the consent of the Government. This seems to be a principle of universal law, and not peculiar to the jurisprudence of any one country. So inflexible is the rule, that in a case where a citizen of the United States has purchased a quantity of British goods, within the British territory, a long time previous to the declaration of hostilities, and had deposited them in an island near the frontier, a vessel hired by him to bring away the goods was captured with the cargo, and condemned as prize of war, by the United States Courts.

To send to the enemy munitions of war, or provisions or supplies of any kind which would enable him to carry on the war more effectually, would be an act of treason.

‘"All contracts with the enemy,"’ says Phillimon, ‘"are null and void; even the insurance of an enemy's property is illegal, upon the ground of its being a species of intercourse with the enemy; for the same reason bills of exchange, made by the subject of one belligerent upon the subject of the other belligerent, are illegal and void. The remission of funds in money or bills to subjects of the enemy, the purchase of bills or the deposit of funds in the enemy's country, are unlawful, because they tend to improve the resources and strengthen the hands of the enemy. In fine, every communication with the State, however circuitous, is prohibited, unless it be sanctioned by the special authority of the Government."’

As to the persons who may be guilty of treason, they are not merely the native inhabitants, nor even the citizens of a country.

Strangers and foreigners who have their domicil there may incur the guilt of treason against the country in which they dwell, by committing such acts as would be treason in a citizen or subject of this country.

"An alien,' says Foster, ‘"whose sovereignty is in amity with the Crown of England, residing here, and receiving the protection of the law, oweth a local allegiance to the Crown during the time of his residence; and if, during the time, the committeth an offence which, in the case of a natural-born subject, would amount to treason, he may be dealt with as a traitor. For his person and personal estate are as much under the protection of the law as the natural-born subjects; and if he is injured in either he hath the same remedy at law for such injury."’ ‘"An alien,"’ continues the same author, ‘"whose sovereign is at enmity with us, living here under the King's protection, and committing offences amounting to treason, may likewise be dealt with as a traitor. For he oweth a temporary local allegiance founded on that share of protection he receiveth."’

These observations of Foster are sound law, and supported by sound reasoning. A foreigner who resides here, and who seeks to receive the benefit and protection of our Government and laws, ought to be punished as a traitor, if he betrays the Government which confides in and protects him.

An act was passed by the Congress of the Confederate States in August last, and approved by the President on the 30th of that month, which I am required to give you specially in charge. It is entitled--(here the Judge read the preamble and first four sections of the Sequestration Act, in the 3d vols of Acts of Congress, page 57.)

The sections of the act which I have thought it proper to read to you, require very little comment. It is only proper to say a word or two to you in reference to alien enemies.

’ The very learned and highly distinguished gentleman who is at the head of the Department of Justice here, the Attorney-General of the Confederate States, has given a very accurate definition of the phrase alien enemies, as used in the act, in these words:

The following persons are subject to the operation of the law as alien enemies:

  1. 1st. All citizens of the United States except citizens of Delaware, Maryland, Kentucky or Missouri, or the District of Columbia or the Territories of New Mexico, Arizona, or the Indian Territory South of Kansas.
  2. 2d. All persons who have a domicil within the States with which this Government is at war, no matter whether they be citizens or not. Thus, the subjects of Great Britain, France, or other neutral nations, who have a domicil, or are carrying, on business or traffic within the States at war with this Confederacy, are alien enemies under the law.
  3. 3d. All such citizens or residents of the States of Delaware, Maryland, Kentucky or Missouri, and the Territories of New Mexico, Arizona, and the Indian Territory South of Kansas and of the District of Columbia, as shall commit actual hostilities against the Confederate States, or aid or abet the United States in the existing war against the Confederate States.
Having explained to you the meaning of the term alien enemies, I do not deem it necessary to add anything more in relation to the act.

As to the testimony upon which a presentment may be made, or an indictment formed, you should be satisfied by it, so far as it goes, that the charges contained in the indictment are true — that is to say, the evidence should be sufficient to create a belief that the statements in the presentment or indictment are true, upon the supposition that there is no further evidence behind to contradict or re-but it.

You should decide the case upon the evidence before you, as if that were all the testimony on either side; and when we remember that evidence is sent to you on the par of the prosecution alone, it is not going too far to say that the evidence ought to be such as would, it standing alone, be sufficient to warrant a belief that the party accused is guilty.

The third section of the Constitution provides, as you have already heard, that ‘"no person shall be convicted of treason unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act; or on confession in open court."’ But although two witnesses are necessary in such a case to justify a conviction, only one is necessary to the finding of an indictment.

In all cases of treason, however, as in every other case, the evidence before you must be legal evidence, and such as would be allowed to go to a petty, or traverse jury.

A Grand Jury can no more listen to hearsay, or other illegal, or unimportant testimony than a petty jury can.

If you should desire further information, gentlemen, on any point of law, the Court will give it to you with pleasure.

I thank you for attending punctually.

You will now retire, if you please, to consider of such matters as may be brought before you.

The Grand Jury, after a short retirement, returned and presented the following:

Confederate States of America against William Y. Hughes — an indictment for a felony — a true bill.

Confederate States of America against John R. Hughes — an indictment for a felony — a true bill.

These parties are charged with uttering and passing counterfeit and forged Treasury notes, in the city of Petersburg. Similar charges against Henry T. Tatum and Louisa Tatum are yet to be acted on.

The Grand Jury will meet again to-day, at 11 o'clock.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.

An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.

hide Dates (automatically extracted)
Sort dates alphabetically, as they appear on the page, by frequency
Click on a date to search for it in this document.
30 AD (1)
March 16th, 1861 AD (1)
August (1)
hide Display Preferences
Greek Display:
Arabic Display:
View by Default:
Browse Bar: