previous next


Neutrality with a Vengeance.

We see it stated that the Yankee Government has made a large contract for arms with certain English manufacturers, to be delivered within a certain time, provided, in the interval, war does not break out between the two countries. As there is no probability that the contingency provided against will happen, the bargain may be considered as closed. The arms will be delivered to the Yankees, and they will kill as many ‘"rebels"’ with them as they can. As our coast is blockaded, and we have no navy, the Yankees have it all their own way. This may be neutrality, for aught we know to the contrary, but to us it seems a very strange kind of neutrality. The next thing to killing a man one's self we take to be giving a third person a weapon to kill him with. When a murder takes place under such circumstances, in ordinary life, the principal is first hung and then the party giving the weapon is indicted as an accessory. The old United States at one time made heavy complaints against the British Government because British subjects were in the habit of selling firearms to the Indians upon the borders. It was for that offence, as well as we recollect, and for the further crime of instigating them to make war upon the while inhabitants, that General Jackson hung Arbuthnot and Administer. We can see but little difference between the two cases, except that we are already engaged in war.

This so-called neutrality of Great Britain is quite as oppressive to us as would be a formal war. It has the effect of depriving us entirely of those munitions of war which she furnishes in profusion to our enemy, who are already enormously superior to us in that particular. If the British Government were disposed to observe a real neutrality, it would take steps to prevent the Yankees from being furnished with what we cannot obtain. It would forbid the exportation of arms by either party. It would allow nothing which would give to one advantages which the other did not possess. When it promised neutrality, it would take care that neither party should profit by it to the detriment of another. A neutrality which destroys one belligerent while it is of infinite benefit to the other, is very much like war upon the injured party.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.

An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.

hide Places (automatically extracted)

View a map of the most frequently mentioned places in this document.

Sort places alphabetically, as they appear on the page, by frequency
Click on a place to search for it in this document.
United States (United States) (1)
England (United Kingdom) (1)
hide People (automatically extracted)
Sort people alphabetically, as they appear on the page, by frequency
Click on a person to search for him/her in this document.
Jackson (1)
Arbuthnot (1)
hide Display Preferences
Greek Display:
Arabic Display:
View by Default:
Browse Bar: