[28]
Again, when we are replying to the
accuser we may sometimes set forth the whole
charge, as Cicero does in the pro Scauro with reference to the death of Bostar,1 where he virtually
parodies the speech of his opponent, or we may take
a number of points raised in the course of the
accusation and put them together as in the pro
Vareno:2 “They have asserted that, when he was
[p. 329]
journeying with Pompulenus through a lonely stretch
of country, he fell in with the slaves of Ancharius, that
Pompulenus was then killed and Varenus imprisoned
on the spot until such time as this man should indicate what he wished to be done with him.” Such a
procedure is useful, if the sequence of facts alleged
by the prosecution is incredible, and likely to lose
its force by restatement. Sometimes, on the other
hand, we may destroy the cumulative force of a
number of statements by refuting them singly; in
fact this is generally the safest course. Sometimes,
again, the different portions of our reply will be
independent of one another, a case which requires
no illustration.
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.