[14]
Some, on
the other hand, entirely reject the elaborate and
formal methods of reasoning employed by dialectic,
regarding such ingenuity as suited rather to quibbles
over words in philosophical discussions than as likely
to carry much weight in the performance of the
duties of an orator. For though in dialogue definition may serve to fetter the person who has got
to reply in chains of his own making, or may force
him to silence, or even to reluctant confession of a
point which tells against himself, it is of less use in
forensic cases.
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.

