[93]
These two statements may seem to
be inconsistent, but as a matter of fact both alike
deserve the praise which they receive. The difference is due to the fact that cases differ in character.
Those of minor importance are admirably suited by
the simplicity and negligence of unaffected language, whereas cases of greater moment are best
suited by the grand style. Cicero is pre-eminent in
both. Now while eminence in one of these styles
may seem to the inexperienced to be within their
grasp, those who understand know that they are
capable of eminence in neither.
II. Some regard memory as being no more than
one of nature's gifts; and this view is no doubt true
to a great extent; but, like everything else, memory
[p. 213]
may be improved by cultivation. And all the labour
of which I have so far spoken will be in vain unless
all the other departments be co-ordinated by the
animating principle of memory. For our whole
education depends upon memory, and we shall
receive instruction all in vain if all we hear slips
from us, while it is the power of memory alone
that brings before us all the store of precedents,
laws, rulings, sayings and facts which the orator
must possess in abundance and which he must
always hold ready for immediate use. Indeed
it is not without good reason that memory has
been called the treasure-house of eloquence.
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.