previous next

I HAVE observed that the philosophers have varying opinions about the method of seeing and the nature of vision. The Stoics say 1 that the causes of sight are the emission of rays from the eyes to those objects which can be seen, and the simultaneous [p. 431] expansion of the air. Epicurus believes 2 that there is a constant flow from all bodies of images of those bodies themselves, and that these impinge upon the eyes and hence the sensation of seeing arises. Plato is of the opinion 3 that a kind of fire or light issues from the eyes, and that this, being united and joined either with the light of the sun or with that of some other fire, by means of its own and the external force makes us see whatever it has struck and illumined. But here too we must not dally longer, but follow the advice of that Neoptolemus in Ennius, of whom I have just written, 4 who advises having a “taste” of philosophy, but not “gorging oneself with it.”

1 II. 871, Arn.

2 319, Usener.

3 Timaeus, p. 45, B.

4 xv. 9.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.

An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.

load focus Introduction (John C. Rolfe, 1927)
load focus Latin (John C. Rolfe, 1927)
hide Display Preferences
Greek Display:
Arabic Display:
View by Default:
Browse Bar: