This text is part of:
Table of Contents:
[1448b]
[1]
Their word for action, they add, is δρᾶν, whereas the Athenian word is πράττειν. So much then for the differences, their number, and their
nature. Speaking generally, poetry seems to owe its origin to two particular causes, both
natural. From childhood men have an
instinct for representation, and in this respect, differs from the other animals
that he is far more imitative and learns his first lessons by representing things.
And then there is the enjoyment people always get from representations. What happens in actual experience proves this,
for we enjoy looking at accurate likenesses of things which are themselves painful
to see, obscene beasts, for instance, and corpses. The reason is this: Learning things gives great pleasure not
only to philosophers but also in the same way to all other men, though they share
this pleasure only to a small degree.
The reason why we enjoy seeing likenesses is that, as we look, we learn and infer
what each is, for instance, "that is so and so." If we have never happened to see the original, our pleasure
is not due to the representation as such but to the technique or the color or some
other such cause.
[20]
We have, then, a
natural instinct for representation and for tune and rhythm1—for the metres are obviously sections of rhythms2—and starting with these
instincts men very gradually developed them until they produced poetry out of their
improvisations. Poetry then split into
two kinds according to the poet's nature. For the more serious poets represented
fine doings and the doings of fine men, while those of a less exalted nature
represented the actions of inferior men, at first writing satire just as the others
at first wrote hymns and eulogies.
Before Homer we cannot indeed name any such poem, though there were probably many
satirical poets, but starting from
Homer, there is, for instance, his Margites3 and other similar poems. For these the iambic metre was fittingly
introduced and that is why it is still called iambic, because it was the metre in
which they lampooned each other.4
Of the ancients some wrote heroic
verse and some iambic. And just as
Homer was a supreme poet in the serious style, since he alone made his
representations not only good but also dramatic, so, too, he was the first to mark
out the main lines of comedy, since he made his drama not out of personal satire but
out of the laughable as such. His Margites indeed provides an
analogy: as are the Iliad and Odyssey to our
tragedies,
1 It is not clear wheter the "two general causes" are (1) the instinct for imitation, (2) the natural enjoyment of mimicry by others; or whether these two are combined into one and the second cause is the instinct for tune and rhythm. Obviously this last is an essential cause of poetry.
2 e.g., the rhythm of the blacksmith's hammer or of a trotting horse is dactylic, but the hexameter is a "section" or slice of that rhythm; it is cut up into sixes.
3 A famous burlesque which Aristotle attributes to Homer. "Other similar poems" must mean other early burlesques not necessarily attributed to Homer.
4 Since the iambic came to be the metre of invective, the verb ἰαμβίζειν acquired the meaning "to lampoon." There is probably implied a derivation from ἰάπτειν, " to assail."
Aristotle. Aristotle in 23 Volumes, Vol. 23, translated by W.H. Fyfe. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press; London, William Heinemann Ltd. 1932.
The Annenberg CPB/Project provided support for entering this text.
Purchase a copy of this text (not necessarily the same edition) from Amazon.com
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.