[
1010b]
[1]
And as concerning
reality, that not every appearance is real, we shall say, first, that
indeed the perception, at least of the proper object of a sense, is
not false, but the impression we get of it is not the same as the
perception.And then
we may fairly express surprise if our opponents raise the question
whether magnitudes and colors are really such as they appear at a
distance or close at hand, as they appear to the healthy or to the
diseased; and whether heavy things are as they appear to the weak or
to the strong; and whether truth is as it appears to the waking or to
the sleeping.For clearly
they do not really believe the latter alternative—at any
rate no one, if in the night he thinks that he is at
Athens whereas he is really in
Africa, starts off to
the Odeum.
1 And again concerning the
future (as indeed Plato says
2)
the opinion of the doctor and that of the layman are presumably not
equally reliable, e.g. as to whether a man will get well or
not.And again in
the case of the senses themselves, our perception of a foreign object
and of an object proper to a given sense, or of a kindred object and
of an actual object of that sense itself, is not equally reliable
3; but in the case of colors
sight, and not taste, is authoritative, and in the case of flavor
taste, and not sight. But not one of the senses ever asserts at the
same time of the same object that it is "so and not so."Nor even at another
time
[20]
does it make a
conflicting statement about the quality, but only about that to which
the quality belongs. I mean, e.g., that the same wine may seem, as the
result of its own change or of that of one's body, at one time sweet
and at another not; but sweetness, such as it is when it exists, has
never yet changed, and there is no mistake about it, and that which is
to be sweet is necessarily of such a nature.Yet all these theories destroy the possibility
of anything's existing by necessity, inasmuch as they destroy the
existence of its essence; for "the necessary" cannot be in one way and
in another; and so if anything exists of necessity, it cannot be "both
so and not so."
And in general, if only
the sensible exists, without animate things there would be nothing;
for there would be no sense-faculty.That there would be neither sensible qualities
nor sensations is probably true
4(for these depend upon an effect produced in the
percipient), but that the substrates which cause the sensation should
not exist even apart from the sensation is impossible.For sensation is not of
itself, but there is something else too besides the sensation, which
must be prior to the sensation;