previous next

[180] v. 25 above. ‘Quod petiere’ is explained by Munro on Lucr. 4.885 as a peculiar use of ‘quod,’ denoting the effect rather than the cause, ‘the reason why they have sailed &c. is,’ a use found also in Lucr. 1. c., Ov. 3 Amor. 5. 39 foll. This is doubtless the case; but he seems to go too far when he says that the instances given by Madv. § 398 b, obs. 2, e.g. “quod scribis te . . ad me venturum, ego vero te istic esse volo” Cic. Fam. 14. 3, are of a different kind. Madv.'s explanation, ‘as to the fact that,’ will apply to all the passages equally, as it will to Lucr. 2. 532., 6. 740, which Prof. Munro considers parallel. Comp. also Prop. 5. 6. 49, “Quodque vehunt prorae Centaurica saxa minantes, Tigna cava et pictos experiere metus.” In each case the speaker is adverting to some fact which he feels himself called upon to meet.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.

An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.

hide Places (automatically extracted)

View a map of the most frequently mentioned places in this document.

Download Pleiades ancient places geospacial dataset for this text.

hide References (2 total)
  • Commentary references from this page (2):
    • Lucretius, De Rerum Natura, 4.885
    • Ovid, Amores, 3.5
hide Display Preferences
Greek Display:
Arabic Display:
View by Default:
Browse Bar: