previous next

[571] Pierius' note on ‘viduasset’ may amuse the reader: “Servius ait, proprieviduassetdictum a Vergilio, quia urbs est generis feminini: abusive vero et satis incongrue ab Horatio dictumviduus pharetra Risit Apollo.Quia scilicet putat ipseviduamquasiviro iduamdici. Atqui sunt ex grammaticis quorum auctoritas minime contemnenda est quividuamaveetduitatedictum velint, sicutvesanusnon sanus, atque ita non incongrue dixerit Horatiusviduus Apollo.” Serv.'s supposed etymology is so far nearer the truth that “viduus” has the same root as “dividere” and “iduare.” ‘Viduo’ occurs Lucr. 5.840, where it is constructed with a gen., as here with an abl. ‘Urbem’ can hardly be Agylla, as Forb. thinks, as unless we read ‘finitimos,’ there is nothing in the context to favour Serv.'s supposition mentioned on v. 569 that Mezentius' treatment of his subjects would have concerned Evander. Mezentius was an ally of Turnus, and Turnus was an enemy of Evander, so that we may readily suppose that Mezentius had been a scourge to his neighbours of Pallanteum. Gossrau's solution, that Mezentius had persisted in his tyranny in defiance of Evander's counsels, seems quite gratuitous.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.

An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.

hide Places (automatically extracted)

View a map of the most frequently mentioned places in this document.

Download Pleiades ancient places geospacial dataset for this text.

hide References (1 total)
  • Commentary references from this page (1):
    • Lucretius, De Rerum Natura, 5.840
hide Display Preferences
Greek Display:
Arabic Display:
View by Default:
Browse Bar: