C. Julius Caesar, De Bello Civili, C. Iuli Caesaris Commentariorum De Bello Civili, Liber Primus, chapter 1

Home Collections/Texts Research Grants Open Source About Help

Hide browse bar Your current position in the text is marked in blue. Click anywhere in the line to jump to another position:

This text is part of:

View text chunked by:

book : chapter : section

... Litteris [a Fabio] C. Caesaris consulibus redditis aegre ab his impetratum est summa tribunorum plebis contentione ut in senatu recitarentur; ut vero ex litteris ad senatum referretur, impetrari non potuit. [2] referunt consules de re publica infinite. L. Lentulus consul senatu rei publicae se non defuturum pollicetur, si audacter ac fortiter sententias dicere velint; [3] sin Caesarem respiciant atque eius gratiam sequantur, ut superioribus fecerint temporibus, se sibi consilium capturum neque senatus auctoritati obtemperaturum; habere se quoque ad Caesaris gratiam atque amicitiam receptum. [4] in eandem sententiam loquitur Scipio: Pompeio esse in animo rei publicae non deesse, si senatus sequatur; si cunctetur atque agat lenius, nequiquam eius auxilium, si postea velit, senatum imploraturum.

C. Julius Caesar. C. Iuli Caesaris Commentariorum, pars posterior. Renatus du Pontet. Oxonii. e Typographeo Clarendoniano. 1901. Scriptorum Classicorum Bibliotheca Oxoniensis.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.

An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.

Caesar's letter being delivered to the consuls, the tribunes, with much difficulty, procured it a reading in the senate; but could by no means prevail to have his demands brought under deliberation. The consuls proposed to debate upon the state of the republic. " Lentulus promised to stand by the senate and the people, if they would deliver their sentiments with freedom and courage; but if they regarded Caesar, and affected to court his friendship, as had been the practice for some time past, he knew, he told them, what he had to do, and was determined to disclaim their authority; not doubting but he would find a ready admittance to the favour and protection of Caesar." Scipio spoke much to the same purpose: "That Pompey was firmly bent not to abandon the republic, if he found the senators ready to support him; but if they cooled, or were remiss in their resolves, it would be in vain for them to expect his aid, if they saw cause afterwards to apply for it." This speech of Scipio, as the senate was held in the city, and Pompey resided in the suburbs, was considered as coming from Pompey's own mouth. Some were for following milder counsels, of which number was M. Marcellus, who gave it as his opinion: "That it was not proper to enter upon the present deliberation, till troops were raised over all Italy, and an army got ready, under whose protection the senate might proceed with freedom and safety in their debates." " Callidius was for sending Pompey to his government, to take away all occasion of discord; because Caesar had reason to fear, as two of his legions had been taken from him, that Pompey retained them in the neighbourhood of Rome, with a view to employ them against him." M. Rufus nearly agreed with Callidius. But they were all severely reprimanded by the consul Lentulus, who expressly refused to put Callidius's motion to the vote. Marcellus, awed by the consul's reprimand, retracted what he had said. Thus the clamours of Lentulus, the dread of an army at the gates of Rome, and the menaces of Pompey's friends, forced the greater part of the senate, though with the utmost reluctance and dislike, into a compliance with Scipio's motion: " That Caesar should be ordered to disband his army before a certain day then fixed; and that in case of disobedience, he should be declared an enemy to the republic." M. Antonius and Q. Cassius, tribunes of the people, opposed their negative to this decree. Immediately a debate arose, upon the validity of their interposition. Many severe speeches were made against them; and the more warm and passionate any one appeared, the more was he applauded by Caesar's enemies.

Commentary references to this page (1):
- Frank Frost Abbott, Commentary on Selected Letters of Cicero, Letter XLII: ad familiares 16.11
Cross-references to this page (4):
- Allen and Greenough's New Latin Grammar for Schools and Colleges, SUBSTANTIVE CLAUSES
- A Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities (1890), LEX
- Smith's Bio, Marcellus Clau'dius
- Smith's Bio, Metellus Scipio
Cross-references in general dictionaries to this page (2):
- Lewis & Short, implōro
- Lewis & Short, lēnis

Greek Display:
Arabic Display:
View by Default:
Browse Bar:

C. Julius Caesar, De Bello Civili
Renatus du Pontet, Ed.

This text is part of:

View text chunked by:

Table of Contents:

C. Julius Caesar, De Bello Civili Renatus du Pontet, Ed.

This text is part of:

View text chunked by:

Table of Contents:

C. Julius Caesar, De Bello Civili
Renatus du Pontet, Ed.