duke a leader, a general, a commander (Lat.
dux):
“ the Duke's own person,”
LOVE'S LABOUR'S LOST, i. 1.
179
(king's);
“to study three years with the Duke”
LOVE'S LABOUR'S LOST, i. 2.
36
(king);
“the duke's pleasure,”
LOVE'S LABOUR'S LOST, i. 2.
121
(king's);
“this virtuous duke”
LOVE'S LABOUR'S LOST, ii. 1.
38
(king);
“Theseus, our renowned duke,”
A MIDSUMMER-NIGHT'S DREAM, i. 1.
20
;
“gracious duke,”
A MIDSUMMER-NIGHT'S DREAM, i. 1,
26
, 38 ;
“before the duke,”
A MIDSUMMER-NIGHT'S DREAM, i. 2.
6
; iii. 1. 5; iv. 1. 212 ;
“make the duke say,”
A MIDSUMMER-NIGHT'S DREAM, i. 2.
64
;
“At the duke's oak,”
A MIDSUMMER-NIGHT'S DREAM, i. 2.
97
;
“The Duke was here,”
A MIDSUMMER-NIGHT'S DREAM, iv. 1.
192
;
“the Duke is coming,”
A MIDSUMMER-NIGHT'S DREAM, iv. 2.
15
;
“an the Duke had not given him sixpence,”
A MIDSUMMER-NIGHT'S DREAM, iv. 2.
20
;
“the Duke hath dined,”
A MIDSUMMER-NIGHT'S DREAM, iv. 2.
31
;
“Be merciful, great duke . . . great duke,”
HENRY V., iii. 2. 21
,23;
“Gonzago is the duke's name,”
HAMLET, iii. 2. 234
(But we learn from the quarto ofHamlet, 1603, that in
this scene of the play within a play, the two principal characters were originally called
Duke and Duchess; and there can be little doubt that when their titles were altered to
King and Queen, the word duke's in the
present passage was left unaltered by an oversight).