right, a bearded man twirling a kylix with his right hand, and holding a black kylix in his left. His left leg is exposed and drawn in front view like that of the man in the interior. His head, shown in front view, is wreathed, and bound with a cloth, drawn in outline, and tied so that its long ends hang at either side.1 His friend, on the second couch, turns round towards him and extends both hands, one holding a cup. He wears a similar headband, with its ends hanging behind, and wreath. At the left a youth seated on a stool, but leaning back against the central figure, plays the flute. He wears a wreath, but no fillet. Two baskets hang above. A table, with wreaths laid on it, stands under each couch. Behind the older man's couch a staff is standing against the wall. In the field, ΗΟ ΠΑΙΣ ΚΑΛΟΣ. Beazley remarks that the cushion of the man at the right on side B is certainly a wine-skin, and the others probably. Wine-skins are used as cushions on the Cambridge cup mentioned below, on the Boston symposium cup by the Panaitios painter Boston 01.8018, Hartwig, Meisterschalen, Pl. XIV, 2, Beazley, Att. V., p. 166, no. 12; and on the erotic cup in Corneto, F.R. iii, p. 252, above. Compare also the silen leaning against a wine-skin on a Brygan plastic kantharos in New York: Richter, Handbook (1927), p. 120, fig. 78.
These paintings were described by Robinson in the Annual Report as 'in the style of Brygos', and definitely attributed to him by Tonks. Their true relationship to the Brygos painter was first made clear by Beazley, who assigns both this cup and its pendant, the symposium cup in Cambridge,2 to the Foundry painter, an artist who shows 'a not always ineffective coarsening of the Brygan style'. In Vases in America, p. 93, figs. 61, 62, Beazley makes a significant comparison between the standing cup-bearer on our vase and a similar figure on the Brygan symposium cup in London, Hartwig, Pl. 34: 'How admirable the drawing in both! only, the Brygan boy is made like us of flesh and air: the other is a most captivating marionette.'3
D. M. Robinson, AJA 32 (1928), p. 50; ARV, p. 264, no. 11; A. Greifenhagen, JBerlMus 3 (1961), p. 128, note 28; ARV2, pp. 401-402, no. 11; Sedlmayr & Messerer 1967, p. 39 (W. Züchner); Para., p. 370, no. 11; Cook 1972, pp. xxi, 169 (fig. 30B), 234-235; S. Karouzou, ArchDelt 31 (1976), p. 19, note 50; CVA, Musée du Louvre, 19, p. 17, under pl. 33, 1-8 (H. Giroux); CVA, Tübingen, 5, pp. 23-24, under no. S./10 1536a.a (J. Burow); Korshak 1987, pp. 13-14, 58, no. 138; Christiansen & Melander 1987, p. 23, note 17 (M. P. Baglione); U. Mandel, 1988, Kleinasiatische Reliefkeramik der mittleren Kaiserzeit (Pergamenische Forschungen 5), Berlin, W. de Gruyter, p. 110, note 786; Beazley 1989, pp. 80-81, pls. 52, 2, 53, 1-2; H. R. Immerwahr, Hesperia 61 (1992), p. 123, note 8.
D. M. Robinson, AJA 32 (1928), p. 50; ARV, p. 264, no. 11; A. Greifenhagen, JBerlMus 3 (1961), p. 128, note 28; ARV2, pp. 401-402, no. 11; Sedlmayr & Messerer 1967, p. 39 (W. Züchner); Para., p. 370, no. 11; Cook 1972, pp. xxi, 169 (fig. 30B), 234-235; S. Karouzou, ArchDelt 31 (1976), p. 19, note 50; CVA, Musée du Louvre, 19, p. 17, under pl. 33, 1-8 (H. Giroux); CVA, Tübingen, 5, pp. 23-24, under no. S./10 1536a.a (J. Burow); Korshak 1987, pp. 13-14, 58, no. 138; Christiansen & Melander 1987, p. 23, note 17 (M. P. Baglione); U. Mandel, 1988, Kleinasiatische Reliefkeramik der mittleren Kaiserzeit (Pergamenische Forschungen 5), Berlin, W. de Gruyter, p. 110, note 786; Beazley 1989, pp. 80-81, pls. 52, 2, 53, 1-2; H. R. Immerwahr, Hesperia 61 (1992), p. 123, note 8.