εὑροῦς᾿, if sound, means simply, ‘having ascertained.’ We may suppose that at least some interval had elapsed between the murder and the institution of these rites. The usurper could not at first feel secure. Having resolved to institute such a festival, Clytaemnestra was careful to see that the day of the month chosen should be precisely that on which the crime was committed. The word τότε, implying some lapse of time, confirms this view: cp. Ai. 650.For “εὑρίσκειν” as=‘to discover by reflection’ cp. Tr. 1178 n.—Others take “εὑροῦσα” as=“ἐπειδὰν εὕρῃ”, i.e., ‘when she has found that day’ by its coming to her in the course of each successive month (Bellermann). So, too, Wecklein, who suggests that “εὑροῦσα” expresses joy at the happy “εὕρημα”. The conjecture φρουροῦς᾿ (cr. n.) is, from a palaeographical point of view, slightly preferable to the rival conjecture τηροῦς᾿, and is supported by Eur. Alc. 27“φρουρῶν τόδ᾽ ἦμαρ”. But no change seems necessary.
This text is part of:
Table of Contents:
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.