previous next

ἂνεἱλόμην: cp. Ph.1239ἂν...ἐβουλόμην” (n.).

σε is subject to each of the three infinitives which follow. It is placed as if the speaker mentally supplied a word such as “παθεῖν”. But ἓν is really an accus. in apposition with the whole sentence, σε μηκέτ᾽ εἶναι, etc. The peculiar order has been due to the metrical difficulty of inserting σε anywhere in vv. 735—737.

ἐκ τριῶν ἓν. Photius and Suidas quote the proverb, “τῶν τριῶν κακῶν ἕν”, illustrating it from Polyzelus (a poet of the later Old Comedy), “τριῶν κακῶν ἕν γ᾽ οὖν ἑλέσθ᾽ αὐτῷ τι πᾶσ᾽ ἀνάγκη”, and Menander, “ἓν γάρ τι τούτων τῶν τριῶν ἔχοι κακῶν”. Cp. schol. Pind. O.1. 97τρία λέγεται κοινῶς καὶ τὰ πρὸς τὸν θάνατον συνεργοῦντα, ξίφος, ἀγχόνη, κρημνός: Σοφοκλῆς” (fr. 822)<*> “λύσω γάρ, εἰ καὶ τῶν τριῶν ἓν οἴσομαι”. A like prov. was “τρία Θηραμένους”, alluding to three alternative penalties proposed by him.

κεκλῆσθαι: cp. 149: El.366πάντων ἀρίστου παῖδα κεκλῆσθαι.—ἀμείψασθαι”, get in exchange: Aesch. Theb.304ποῖον δ᾽ ἀμείψεσθε γαίας πέδον” | “τᾶσδ᾽ ἄρειον; ποθεν” is wholly vague: the schol.'s “ἐκ θεοῦ τινος” is too definite.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.

An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.

hide References (5 total)
  • Commentary references from this page (5):
    • Aeschylus, Seven Against Thebes, 304
    • Pindar, Olympian, 1
    • Sophocles, Electra, 366
    • Sophocles, Philoctetes, 1239
    • Sophocles, Trachiniae, 149
hide Display Preferences
Greek Display:
Arabic Display:
View by Default:
Browse Bar: