Since Chrysogonus was a favorite of Sulla's, Cicero had to be careful not to appear to attack the Dictator. Hence he interrupts the story of the plot to express his certainty that Sulla had not known what was going on, and to excuse him on the ground of the pressure of public business. certo scio, I feel sure: § 322, c (151, c). neque enim: negative of et enim, introducing a point obvious or indisputable, for, you see, it is not surprising (cf. p. 4, l. 16, above) ; § 324, h (1 56, d) ; cf. H.-B. 311,6 and b. mirum [est] is the apodosis and si . . . animadvertat (p. 6, l. 4) is the protasis. mirum [est] is the main clause of the whole period ; the long parenthesis (lines 29-4) consists of a string of causal clauses with cum (which may be translated either when or since). praeparet, must provide for. pacis . . . rationem, i.e. the ordering of the new constitution. si aliquid (more emphatic than si quid) non animadvertat, if there is something he does not notice protasis with mirum [est], above ; § 572, b, N. (333, b, R.) ; G. 542, N.1. ut . . . moliantur (clause of purpose), that as soon as he turns away his eyes they may get up something of this sort. despexerit, perf. subj.: § 593 (342); B. 324, 1; G. 663, 1; H. 652 (529, ii); H.-B. 539; for fut. perf., § 484, c (286, end) ; B. 269, I, b; G. 514; H. 541, 2 (496, ii); H.-B. 470, 1, footnote 1. huc accedit, add to this. Notice the difference of order and consequently of emphasis between huc accedit (add to this) here, and accedit illa (there is in addition) in sect. 4, above. quamvis felix sit, however fortunate he may be: § 527, a (313, a) ; B. 309, 1 ; G. 606; H. 586,11(515, iii); H.-B. 532, 2. Sulla was so impressed with his own good fortune, that he assumed the agnomen Felix, which implied, according to ancient notions, the peculiar favor of the gods (See Manil., sect. 47.) familia, household of slaves and dependents (see under sect 35). qui habeat as to have § 535 a (320 a) B. 283, 2; G 631 2; H 589 ii (500 i) H.-B. 521, 1. libertum: a freedman still remained attached to his former master (now his patronus) often lived in his family did various services for him, and stood towards him in relation somewhat like that of a son under the patria potestas. Towards others he was a libertinus fully free but with some political disqualifications ; towards his former master he was a libertus.
This text is part of:
Table of Contents:
text S. Rosc.
Defence of Roscius. ( Pro Sex. Roscio Amerino ) B.C. 80.
Roscius had not only no motive to commit the crime, but no means of committing it. Erucius is challenged to tell how Roscius could himself have killed his father or could have procured his death through others.
The sale of the property of the elder Roscius was illegal and his proscription in every way irregular. For this act Chrysogonus is to be blamed, not Sulla for Sulla was necessarily so much occupied with affairs of state that details of this kind escaped his attention.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.