previous next


(templum, Liv. xxiv. 47, Ovid):

a temple in the forum Boarium (Liv. xxxiii. 27. 4; Ov. Fast. vi. 477-479), just inside the porta Carmentalis (Liv. xxv. 7. 6), ascribed by tradition to Servius Tullius (Liv. v. 19. 6; Ov. Fast. vi. 480), restored and dedicated by Camillus in 395 B.C. (Liv. v. 19. 6, 23. 7; Plut. Cam. 5); it was burned in 213 (Liv. xxiv. 47. 15), and restored the next year by triumvirs appointed for the purpose, together with the temple of Fortuna (Liv. xxv. 7. 6; for a possible later restoration, see below). In 196 B.C. two arches (fornices) with gilded statues were set up by L. Stertinius in front of the temples of Mater Matuta and Fortuna (Liv. xxxiii. 27. 4), and if, as is probable, these arches were part of a colonnade surrounding them both, the temples must have been near together and perhaps had the same orientation. In the temple of Matuta Ti. Sempronius Gracchus placed a bronze tablet1 (Liv. xli. 28. 8), on which was a record of his campaigns in Sardinia and a map of the island. The day of dedication was that of the Matralia, Ith June (Fasti Tusc. Ven. Maff. ad iii id. Iun., CIL i. p. 216, 222, 224, 320; Fast. Ant. ap. NS 1921, 98-from which we learn that it was also the day of dedication of the temple of FORTUNA (q.v.)).

On the north side of the modern Piazza della Bocca della Verita, a site corresponding to that indicated by the evidence of literature, is an ancient temple converted into the church of S. Maria Egiziaca in 872 (Arm. 612). The temple is Ionic (111. 31), 20 metres long and 12 wide, with north-south orientation parallel to the Tiber, tetrastyle prostyle, and stands on a podium 2.50 metres in height and originally 26 metres long. It was pseudo-peripteral, with five engaged columns in the side walls of the cella and a pronaos. The two free columns of the pronaos were walled up to increase the size of the church ; but the temple has recently been isolated and all modern accretions have been removed. The cella walls and engaged columns, except those at the angles, are of tufa; the columns of the pronaos, the capitals of all the columns, the architrave and cornice, and the facing of the podium, of travertine. The frieze was decorated with ox-skulls and garlands, but most of this decoration has disappeared.2 The temple faced toward the street leading up from the pons Aemilius, and not toward the forum Boarium proper. This has sometimes been identified with the temple of Fortuna, but it is more probable that it is that of Mater Matuta. If this is correct, the temple must have been restored about the middle of the first century B.C., to which period the construction seems to point. For this identification, see Huilsen, DAP 2. vi. 270; and for a complete description of the existing structure, Fiechter, Mitt. 1906, 220-279; also Rosch. ii. 2462-2463; D'Esp. Fr. i. 50; ZA 251-253; TF 134-136; YW 1924-5, 85; Mufioz, Tempio della Fortuna Virile, Rome 1925; ASA 20, 21, 77; Mitt. 1925, 321-350, for an identification of this temple with that of PORTUNUS (q.v.), the attribution of the round temple being treated as uncertain; and for an erroneous identification (Cybele) by Cecchelli, cf. ZA cit. For its mediaeval history see HCh 258, 336, 590, 597; BC 1925, 57-69, where it is identified with S. Maria de Gradellis; cf. MOLINAE.

1 Urlichs, Malerei vor Caesar, interprets 'tabula' as 'picture,' and probably rightly. There is no word of its being of bronze. For a similar inscription (the painting is not mentioned) in the temple of the Lares Permarini see Liv. xl. 52. 4.

2 For a theory, for which there is no evidence, that this stucco decoration belongs to the Renaissance period, see Gnomon i. (1925), 367.

hide Dates (automatically extracted)
Sort dates alphabetically, as they appear on the page, by frequency
Click on a date to search for it in this document.
50 BC (1)
395 BC (1)
196 BC (1)
hide Display Preferences
Greek Display:
Arabic Display:
View by Default:
Browse Bar: