ROSTRA
the original platform from which the orators addressed the
people. It took its name from the beaks of the ships captured from the
people of Antium in 338 B.C. with which it was decorated (Plin.
NH xxxiv.
20;
Liv. viii. 14. 12). It was situated on the south side of the Comitium
in front of the Curia Hostilia (Varro,
LL v. 155;
Diodor. xii. 26; Ascon.
in Milon. 12:
ad comitium prope iuncta Curiae; cf. Plin.
NH vii. 212)
in close connection with the
SEPULCRUM ROMULI (q.v.), i.e. between the
Comitium and forum, so that the speaker could address the people
assembled in either. It is spoken of as the most prominent place in the
forum (Plin.
NH xxxiv. 24:
senatus statuam poni iussit quam oculatissimo loco, eaque est in rostris; cf. Dionys.
Hal. i. 87:
ἐν τῷ κρατίστῳ χωρίῳ παρὰ τοῖς ἐμβόλοις). It was consecrated as a templum (
Liv. ii.
56; Cic. in Vatin. 24), and on it were placed statues of famous men
(Cic.
Phil. ix. 16) in such numbers that at times they had to be removed
to make way for others (
Liv. iv. 17;
viii. 13; Plin.
NH xxxiv. 23-25;
Velleius ii. 61, etc.); while the
COLUMNA ROSTRATA C. DUILII (q.v.)
stood on or close by it.
The name rostra vetera is only used in Suet. Aug. 100:
bifariam
laudatus est, pro aede divi Iulii a Tiberio et pro rostris veteribus a Druso;
where it refers to the rostra transferred by Caesar to the north-west end
of the forum in contradistinction to the rostra at the temple of Divus
Iulius; though it is commonly and conveniently used to signify the
republican rostra in contradistinction to the rostra of Caesar.
Excavations in the Comitium have brought to light remains which
must be attributed to the republican rostra, though much doubt attaches
to their exact interpretation. 'It would appear that about the middle
of the fifth century B.C. the Comitium was separated from the forum
by a low platform, upon which stood the archaic cippus, the cone, and
probably an earlier monument, represented by the existing sacellum.
After the fire that followed the Gallic invasion, the first platform was
replaced by a higher, to which a straight flight of steps led up from the
second level of the
COMITIUM (q.v.). A wall, 3 metres in front of these
steps, perhaps formed part of the rostra (Hulsen in
Mitt. 1905, 29-32
and pl. ii.-the best plan available of the rostra of both periods; cf. also
HC pl. v.). In this platform was an irregular space, bounded by walls
on each side, enclosing the monuments in question. Whether remains
of the platform of this period exist, or whether the cappellaccio slabs
which have been attributed to it are really the bedding for the tufa
slabs of the next period, is a moot point. According to another theory,
a kerb along the northern edge of the cappellaccio pavement in front of
the basilica Aemilia marked the front line of the original rostra (
CR 1901,
138;
JRS 1922, 7).
There is no trace of any alteration in the rostra corresponding with
the third level of the Comitium; but in correspondence with the fourth
we have a reconstruction of the rostra on a new plan. 'Its remains
consist (I) of a curved structure of large blocks of Monte Verde tufa,
forming two steps about 35 cm. high, which rested on a foundation of
cappellaccio (grey) tufa 15 cm. high; (2) of a low corridor or canalis,
1 metre wide and about 75 cm. high, parallel to the curved line of the steps
and about 9 metres from them; (3) of a platform, or suggestus, to the
west of the niger lapis, and (4) of a row of shafts, or pozzi, running east
and west, about 6.75 metres distant from the platform. The portion
of the platform ... .on which the curved flight of steps rested, lay about
one metre above the floor of the Comitium.' It has a fine pavement of
Monte Verde tufa, along the front of which runs a raised kerb. According
to one view these monuments are attributable to the period of Sulla
(
JRS 1922, 21-25 ;
Mitt. 1905, 32-39; TF 61-66). Whether the 'Tomb
of Romulus ' was hidden from view at this period or later, is uncertain.
The curved front of the rostra, as represented by the canalis with
the beaks of ships with which it was adorned, is held to be represented in
a coin of 45 B.C. of Lollius Palikanus (HC p. 69, fig. 26; BM.
Rep. i. 517,
4011-3). The arcade at the back of the rostra Augusti, which Boni
(
NS 1900, 627-634) has called the rostra Caesaris, belongs to the time of
Sulla, and is simply a low viaduct to support the
CLIVUS CAPITOLINUS
(q.v.) and a street branching off from it (P1. 227-228;
CR 1901, 87-89;
HC cit.,
Mitt. 1902, 13-16;
1905, 14-15, 25;
JRS 1922, 15-16).
On the rostra, see
Jord. i. 2. 353-355; Petersen, Comitium, Rostra,
Grab des Romulus
(Rome 1904);
Mitt. 1902, 36;
1905, 29-39; HC
105-116; RE i. A. 450-461; DR 347-358.