previous next

[255] εἰ γὰρ νῦν ἐλθών. Here begins the wish, which is interrupted by the description of the visit to Ephyra, and is resumed again at “τοῖος ἐὼν ὁμιλήσειεν” inf. 265; the apodosis to “εἰ” coming in at “πάντες κ᾽ ὠκύμοροι γενοίατο”. For, though “εἰ γάρ” is rightly described as expressing a wish, it only does so because it introduces as protasis a hypothetical sentence to which the apodosis may or may not be expressed.

Cp. Od.3. 218-224 “εἰ γάρ σ᾽ ὣς ἐθέλοι φιλέειν” . . then follows a parenthesis of four lines, the apodosis being introduced with “τῷ κεν”.

Od. 16. 148, 149εἰ γάρ πως εἴη . . πρῶτόν κεν ἑλοίμεθα” .

Od. 17. 496, 497εἰ γὰρ τέλος γένοιτο . . οὐκ ἄν τις ἵκοιτο” .

Od. 18. 366-375εἰ γὰρ ἔρις γένοιτο” , subdivided into “ἐγὼν δρέπανον ἔχοιμι, σὺ δὲ τοῖον ἔχοις”, then the protasis resumed “εἰ δ᾽ αὖ βόες εἶεν . . τετράγυον δ᾽ εἴη . . εἴκοι δὲ ὑπὸ βῶλος ἀρότρῳ”, and, at last, the apodosis comes, “τῷ κέ μ᾽ ἴδοις”.

Il.13. 276-287 “εἰ γὰρ νῦν λεγοίμεθα”, then follows a parenthesis of ten lines, then the apodosis, “οὐδέ κεν ἔνθα τις ὄνοιτο”, ib. 485, 486εἰ γὰρ ὁμηλικίη γε γενοίμεθα . . αἶψά κεν ἠὲ φέροιτο”.

Il.17. 156εἰ γὰρ νῦν ἐνείη . . αἶψά κεν ἐρυσαίμεθα”. In the foregoing cases an apodosis, however delayed, comes at last; but in the following, it remains unexpressed.

Od.15. 545εἰ γάρ κεν σὺ μίμνοις”.

Il. 8. 538, 539εἰ γὰρ ἐγὼν ὣς εἴην . . τιοίμην δέ” .

Il.13. 825 foll. “εἰ γὰρ ἐγὼν εἴην . . τέκοι δὲ . . τιοίμην δέ”. So that “εἰ γάρ” seems merely to express a wish, but it may generally be translated ‘if only.’

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.

An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.

hide References (10 total)
hide Display Preferences
Greek Display:
Arabic Display:
View by Default:
Browse Bar: