There is an anacoluthon here; the construction is just like 10.224 “σύν τε δύ᾽ ἐρχομένω, καί τε πρὸ ὁ τοῦ ἐνόησεν”. In both cases the sentence begins as if “ἄμφω” (“δύο”) were to be continued in distributive apposition (“ἀπὸ ὅλου εἰς μέρη”) by an “ὁ μὲν .. ὁ δέ” (as Od. 18.95 “δὴ τότ᾽ ἀνασχομένω ὁ μὲν ἤλασε δεξιὸν ὦμον”“Ἶρος, ὁ δ᾽ αὐχέν᾽ ἔλασσεν,” 7.306, 12.400, etc.). But here the second member is forgotten altogether; in K the two are run together into “πρὸ ὁ τοῦ”. Cf. also Od. 12.73 “οἱ δὲ δύω σκόπελοι ὁ μέν” .. followed by “τὸν δ᾽ ἕτερον” 101. Zenod. read “ἑζομένων”, apparently regarding “ἄμφω” as indeclinable (it is not found in H. except in nom. and acc.).
This text is part of:
Table of Contents:
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.