This text is part of:
Table of Contents:
By a grammatical laxity is appears instead of a repeated qui in a line like Trin. 1141 “quem ego nec qui esset noram, neque eum ante usquam conspexi prius” (cf. Poen. 624 “fortunati omnes sitis, quod certo scio nec fore nec Fortunam id situram fieri”). On the common Attraction of the Antecedent to the Relative and the very rare Attraction of the Relative to the Antecedent, see above, I, 8, 9.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.