previous next

ἀσχημονεῖ κτλ. Cf. Theaet. 174 B, C ὅταν ἐν δικαστηρίῳ που ἄλλοθι ἀναγκασθῇ περὶ τῶν παρὰ πόδαςδιαλέγεσθαι, γέλωτα παρέχει ἀσχημοσύνη δεινὴγελοῖος φαίνεται. The whole of the description of the φιλόσοφος in the Theaetetus should be carefully compared with this passage.

ἔτι ἀμβλυώττων is logically subordinate to ἀναγκαζόμενος.

τῶν τοῦ δικαίου κτλ. treats the Cave as an allegory of δοξαστά (see on VI 510 A, VII 517 A). The expression ‘shadows of the just’ is vague (cf. σκιαμαχούντων in 520 C), and ἀγαλμάτων ὧν αἱ σκιαί introduces more precision. We may regard ἀγαλμάτων as symbolising the enacted laws of a city, and their shadows as the “representation or misrepresentation of the existing laws (themselves only ‘images’ of justice) by a rhetorician or pleader” (Nettleship Hell. p. 141 note 1). Compare (with Shorey Idea of Good etc. p. 287) Soph. 234 C and Pol. 303 C.

ὅπῃ ποτὲ -- ἰδόντων. For the real point at issue is not the law, but the judges' interpretation thereof. Plato is doubtless thinking of Socrates and his judges throughout the whole of this passage.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.

An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.

hide References (2 total)
  • Commentary references from this page (2):
    • Plato, Sophist, 234c
    • Plato, Theaetetus, 174b
hide Display Preferences
Greek Display:
Arabic Display:
View by Default:
Browse Bar: