This text is part of:
[196]
men and one woman, seated at a dinner-table laid for six, and talking of their art and of themselves.
What would the others think of Poe?
I fancy that Thackeray would chat with him courteously, but would not greatly care for him. George Eliot, woman-like, would pity him. Hawthorne would watch him with those inscrutable eyes and understand him better than the rest.
But Stevenson would be immensely interested; he would begin an essay on Poe before he went to sleep.
And Mr. Kipling would look sharply at him: he has seen that man before, in The Gate of a hundred sorrows.
All of them would find in him something to praise, a great deal to marvel at, and perhaps not much to love.
And the sensitive, shabby, lonely Poe-what would he think of them?
He might not care much for the other guests, but I think he would say to himself with a thrill of pride: “I belong at this table.”
And he does.
Walt Whitman, whom his friend O'Connor dubbed the “good gray poet,” offers a bizarre contrast to Edgar Allan Poe. There was nothing distinctively American about Poe except his ingenuity; he had no interest in American history or in American ideas; he was a timeless, placeless embodiment of technical artistry.
But Whitman
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.