[
365]
Chapter 42:
the relations of
Grant and
Logan began almost with the war.
Grant tells in his ‘Memoirs’ of his anxiety about
Logan's position in the early days of the great struggle.
The future
General-in-Chief was commanding a regiment which had yet not marched to the front, when he was approached by important people who wished him to allow
Logan and
McClernand to address his troops.
As both these orators had been prominent Democrats,
Grant hesitated at first to give the permission; but he found
Logan's speech full of fiery patriotism, and
Logan's action at this crisis,
Grant often declared, had prodigious influence with the people of the southern portion of
Illinois.
His personal popularity undoubtedly contributed to keep ‘
Egypt,’ as the region is called, loyal to the
Union.
The occasion of
Logan's speech was the first meeting between these two men, destined afterward to be so closely associated in politics as well as war.
When I first went to
Grant the praises of
Logan were constantly on his lips.
I had never met the great volunteer general at the time, and
Grant never tired of telling me his history.
So, too, when I wrote a volume on
Grant's early campaigns, I got all my information in regard to
Logan, firsthand from
Grant.
He traced for me
Logan's entire career, by his own side at
Belmont,
Donelson,
Corinth, and in the
Vicksburg campaign; and always said that
Logan and
Crocker were the two best generals from civil life that the war produced.
[
366]
On the death of
McPherson,
Sherman nominated
Howard, the junior of
Logan, to the command of the Army of the Tennessee, which
Logan was holding temporarily.
Grant did not agree with
Sherman's estimate of the relative ability of
Logan and
Howard, but he refused to interfere with
Sherman's choice.
Logan was bitterly disappointed, yet he remained and served with unflinching zeal under the man who had been his junior, though
Hooker at the same time, and for the same cause, requested to be relieved.
This was not the only instance of magnanimity in
Logan's career.
In December, 1864, when
Grant became impatient at what he thought the needless delay of
Thomas at
Nashville,
Logan was directed to take command of the Army of the Cumberland, and started to obey the order.
This was the greatest promotion he had yet received and offered that opportunity for separate distinction which every soldier covets; but when he arrived at
Louisville, on his way from
City Point, he received the news of
Thomas's great victory, and instantly telegraphed to
Grant, proposing that he should now himself return to his subordinate command.
Such greatness of soul always recommended itself to
Grant.
But
Logan was also capable of intense bitterness, and on one or two occasions his course was very different from what
Grant could either indorse or admire.
In
General Sherman's ‘Memoirs’ he described
Logan and
Blair as political generals, and assigned that as the reason why he had nominated neither to command the Army of the Tennessee.
His language was unfortunate and gave great offense to both those officers.
I have no doubt that
Sherman himself afterward regretted its use; but once uttered, the mischief could not be undone.
Logan was as firm in his enmities as his friendships, and he never forgave
Sherman this slur upon his military reputation.
In the course of time he became a member of the Senate, and in all military matters his influence was almost controlling.
It was his voice
[
367]
which decided that
Sherman should be retired from the command of the army at the age of sixty-four, though
Sherman's friends, and many, or rather all, who were simply grateful for his transcendent services, strove earnestly for his retention.
But
Logan prevailed.
It was a bitter revenge to set aside so eminent a man, his old commander, in the prime of his powers, and in the face of the world, as punishment for a few hasty words of ill-judged criticism.
I talked with
Grant more than once on this subject; he differed entirely with
Logan, and although he considered
Sherman's language injudicious, he was still more earnest in condemning
Logan's course.
So, too,
Logan was unrelenting in his pursuit of
Fitz John Porter.
He came nearer quarreling with
Grant on this point than at any other stage of their long intimacy.
I happened to be in
Washington a day or two after
Grant's first letter in behalf of
Porter was made public, and
Logan spoke to me very bitterly on the subject; more harshly indeed than I ever cared to repeat to
Grant, though doubtless what was said was meant for repetition.
But I did not wish to be the means of creating a rupture, and merely told
Grant that
Logan felt very sore.
Each maintained what he thought the proper course, and after a while
Logan's asperity, at least towards
Grant, was softened, though he never ceased to condemn
Grant's action.
But their relations were hardly interrupted, and finally became as warm again as ever.
On
Grant's side there had never, indeed, been any coolness, nor perhaps is coolness the word for
Logan's feeling; it was heat; heat towards
Porter, that boiled over even on
Grant.
There was also a time while
Grant was
President, when a difference arose between them that threatened to provoke antagonism, but this was no difference of principle, it was personal purely; and when the occasion passed, the temper of each was appeased, and they became better friends than ever.
Grant, indeed, was very grateful to
Logan, for his political as well as military services.
In the final effort for a ‘third
[
368]
term,’
Logan's action was as important and as steadfast as that of any other man; and
Grant never forgot those who stuck by him in this critical emergency.
When he wrote his ‘Memoirs,’ he took unusual pains to say what he thought would gratify
Logan; he enlarged the passages that described
Logan's excellences, and was determined to paint him in the liveliest colors.
His heart was in the tribute that he paid his friend, and all the more because of the shade of difference that had passed across their life.
time intimacy.
Logan in return was loyal to
Grant when business misfortune and calumny came.
Grant would have preferred
Logan to succeed
Hayes, to any other man; and in the last months of his life he often spoke of
Logan, always with warmth and admiration and affection.
Logan, like
Grant, attempted to write his ‘Memoirs,’ and he, like
Grant, was mortified at his political failures; he too was tortured by financial troubles; and he too was cut off before he reached old age. He did not stay long behind after
Grant had departed.
He had followed his chief in his campaigns of conquest, in his political life, in his literary attempts, and kept step with him at last in that great march from which there is no return.
