This text is part of:
Table of Contents:
is how to put the judge into a certain frame of mind. They give no account of the artificial proofs,1 which make a man a master of rhetorical argument.
1 Systematic logical proofs （enthymeme, for example）, including testimony as to character and appeals to the emotions （2.3）, which the rhetorician has to invent （ εὑρεῖν, inventio） for use in particular cases. They are contrasted with “inartificial” proofs, which have nothing to do with the rules of the art, but are already in existence, and only need to be made use of. The former are dealt with in chs. 4-14, the latter in ch. 15 of this book.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.