<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<TEI.2><text><body><div1 n="12" type="Book" org="uniform" sample="complete"><p><milestone n="1072b" unit="section" /><milestone n="1" ed="Bekker" unit="line" />and that which is first in a class is
					always best or analogous to the best.<milestone ed="P" unit="para" />That the final cause may apply to immovable things is shown by the
					distinction of its meanings. For the final cause is not only "the good
					<emph>for something</emph>," but also "the good which is
					<emph>the end of some action</emph>." In the latter sense it
					applies to immovable things, although in the former it does not; and
					it causes motion as being an object of love, whereas all other things
					cause motion because they are themselves in motion.<milestone n="7.5" ed="P" unit="Loeb chap" />Now if a thing is moved, it can be
					otherwise than it is. Therefore if the actuality of "the heaven" is
					primary locomotion, then in so far as "the heaven" is moved, in this
					respect at least it is possible for it to be otherwise; i.e. in
					respect of place, even if not of substantiality. But since there is
					something—X—which moves while being itself
					unmoved, existing actually, X cannot be otherwise in any
					respect.<milestone n="7.6" ed="P" unit="Loeb chap" />For the
					primary kind of change is locomotion,<note resp="Tredennick" anchored="yes" place="unspecified">Proved in <bibl n="Aristot. Ph. 8.7" default="NO">Aristot.
						Physics 8.7</bibl>.</note> and of locomotion circular
					locomotion<note resp="Tredennick" anchored="yes" place="unspecified">
						<bibl n="Aristot. Ph. 8.9" default="NO">Aristot. Physics 8.9</bibl>
					</note>; and this is the motion which X induces. Thus X is necessarily
					existent; and <hi rend="Italic">qua</hi> necessary it is good, and is
					in this sense a first principle.<note resp="Tredennick" anchored="yes" place="unspecified">The argument is: X (the prime mover), since it imparts the
						primary motion, cannot be liable to motion (or change) of any
						kind. Therefore it exists of necessity, and must be good (cf.
						<bibl n="Aristot. Met. 5.1015b" default="NO" valid="yes">Aristot. Met. 5.5.6</bibl>); and it is <hi rend="Italic">qua</hi> good, i.e., the object of desire,
						that X is a first principle.</note> For the necessary has all
					these meanings: that which is by constraint because it is contrary to
					impulse; and that without which excellence is impossible; and that
					which cannot be otherwise, but is absolutely necessary.<note resp="Tredennick" anchored="yes" place="unspecified">Cf. <bibl n="Aristot. Met. 5.1015a" default="NO" valid="yes">Aristot. Met. 5.5</bibl></note><milestone ed="P" unit="para" />Such, then, is the first principle upon which
					depend the sensible universe and the world of nature.<milestone n="7.7" ed="P" unit="Loeb chap" />And its life is like the best
					which we temporarily enjoy. It must be in that state always (which for
					us is impossible), since its actuality is also pleasure.<note resp="Tredennick" anchored="yes" place="unspecified">For the relation of pleasure to
						actuality or activity see <bibl n="Aristot. Nic. Eth. 1174a" default="NO" valid="yes">Aristot. Nic. Eth.
							10.4</bibl>.</note>(And for this reason waking, sensation and
					thinking are most pleasant, and hopes and memories are pleasant
					because of them.) Now thinking in itself is concerned with that which
					is in itself best, and thinking in the highest sense with that which
					is in the highest sense best.<note resp="Tredennick" anchored="yes" place="unspecified">Since the prime mover is pure actuality, and has or rather is
						the highest form of life, Aristotle identifies it with the
						highest activity—pure thinking.</note><milestone n="20" ed="Bekker" unit="line" /><milestone n="7.8" ed="P" unit="Loeb chap" />And thought thinks itself through
					participation in the object of thought; for it becomes an object of
					thought by the act of apprehension and thinking, so that thought and
					the object of thought are the same, because that which is receptive of
					the object of thought, i.e. essence, is thought. And it actually
					functions when it possesses this object.<note resp="Tredennick" anchored="yes" place="unspecified">In actualization the subject and object of
						thought (like those of perception, <bibl n="Aristot. de An. 3.2" default="NO">Aristot. De Anima
							3.2</bibl>.) are identical.</note> Hence it is actuality
					rather than potentiality that is held to be the divine possession of
					rational thought, and its active contemplation is that which is most
					pleasant and best.<milestone n="7.9" ed="P" unit="Loeb chap" />If,
					then, the happiness which God always enjoys is as great as that which
					we enjoy sometimes, it is marvellous; and if it is greater, this is
					still more marvellous. Nevertheless it is so. Moreover, life belongs
					to God. For the actuality of thought is life, and God is that
					actuality; and the essential actuality of God is life most good and
					eternal. We hold, then, that God is a living being, eternal, most
					good; and therefore life and a continuous eternal existence belong to
					God; for that is what God is.<milestone ed="P" unit="para" /><milestone n="7.10" ed="P" unit="Loeb chap" /> Those who suppose, as do the
					Pythagoreans and Speusippus,<note resp="Tredennick" anchored="yes" place="unspecified">The
						view is referred to again in <bibl n="Aristot. Met. 12.1075a" default="NO" valid="yes">Aristot. Met.
							12.10.6</bibl>, <bibl n="Aristot. Met. 14.1091a" default="NO" valid="yes">Aristot. Met. 14.4.2, 3</bibl>,
						<bibl n="Aristot. Met. 14.1092a" default="NO" valid="yes">Aristot. Met. 14.5.1</bibl>.</note> that
					perfect beauty and goodness do<milestone ed="P" unit="para" />not exist
					in the beginning (on the ground that whereas the first beginnings of
					plants and animals are causes, it is in the products of these that
					beauty and perfection are found) are mistaken in their
					views.<milestone n="7.11" ed="P" unit="Loeb chap" />For seed
					comes from prior creatures which are perfect, and that which is first
					is not the seed but the perfect creature. </p></div1></body></text></TEI.2>