<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<TEI.2><text lang="en"><body><div1 type="Book" n="8" org="uniform" sample="complete"><p><milestone n="11" unit="section" />Perhaps then we may say that,
					when the friendship is one of utility, the measure of the service should be its value to
					the recipient, since it is he who wants it, and the other comes to his aid in the
					expectation of an equivalent return; therefore the degree of assistance rendered has been
					the amount to which the recipient has benefited, <milestone n="20" unit="bekker line" />
					and so he ought to pay back as much as he has got out of it; or even more, for that will
					be more noble. </p>
				<p>In friendships based on virtue, complaints do not arise, but the measure of the benefit
					seems to be the intention<note anchored="yes" resp="Rackham" place="unspecified">Lit.,
						‘choice’ in Aristotle's technical sense.</note> of the giver; for
					intention is the predominant factor in virtue and in character. </p></div1></body></text></TEI.2>