<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<TEI.2><text><group><text n="Phaedo"><body><sp><p><milestone unit="page" n="93" /><milestone n="93a" unit="section" />than that in which the elements are of which it is composed?”<milestone ed="P" unit="para" />“Certainly not.”<milestone ed="P" unit="para" />“And it can neither do nor suffer anything other than they do or suffer?”<milestone ed="P" unit="para" />He agreed.<milestone ed="P" unit="para" />“Then a harmony cannot be expected to lead the elements of which it is composed, but to follow them.”<milestone ed="P" unit="para" />He assented.<milestone ed="P" unit="para" />“A harmony, then, is quite unable to move or make a sound or do anything else that is opposed to its component parts.”<milestone ed="P" unit="para" />“Quite unable,” said he.<milestone ed="P" unit="para" />“Well then, is not every harmony by nature a harmony according as it is harmonized?”<milestone ed="P" unit="para" />“I do not understand,” said Simmias.<milestone ed="P" unit="para" />“Would it not,” said Socrates, “be more completely a harmony
<milestone n="93b" unit="section" />and a greater harmony if it were harmonized more fully and to a greater extent, assuming that to be possible, and less completely a harmony and a lesser harmony if less completely harmonized and to a less extent?”<milestone ed="P" unit="para" />“Certainly.”<milestone ed="P" unit="para" />“Is this true of the soul?  Is one soul even in the slightest degree more completely and to a greater extent a soul than another, or less completely and to a less extent?”<milestone ed="P" unit="para" />“Not in the least,” said he.<milestone ed="P" unit="para" />“Well now,” said he, “one soul is said to possess sense and virtue and to be good, and another to possess folly and wickedness and to be bad;  and is this true?”
<milestone n="93c" unit="section" />“Yes, it is true.”<milestone ed="P" unit="para" />“Now what will those who assume that the soul is a harmony say that these things—the virtue and the wickedness—in the soul are?  Will they say that this is another kind of harmony and a discord, and that the soul, which is itself a harmony, has within it another harmony and that the other soul is discordant and has no other harmony within it?”<milestone ed="P" unit="para" />“I cannot tell,” replied Simmias, “but evidently those who make that assumption would say some thing of that sort.”<milestone ed="P" unit="para" />“But we agreed,” said Socrates,
<milestone n="93d" unit="section" />“that one soul is no more or less a soul than another;  and that is equivalent to an agreement that one is no more and to no greater extent, and no less and to no less extent, a harmony than another, is it not?”  “Certainly.”<milestone ed="P" unit="para" />“And that which is no more or less a harmony, is no more or less harmonized.  Is that so?”  “Yes.”<milestone ed="P" unit="para" />“But has that which is no more and no less harmonized any greater or any less amount of harmony, or an equal amount?” “An equal amount.”<milestone ed="P" unit="para" />“Then a soul, since it is neither more nor less
<milestone n="93e" unit="section" />a soul than another, is neither more nor less harmonized.”<milestone ed="P" unit="para" />“That is so.”<milestone ed="P" unit="para" />“And therefore can have no greater amount of discord or of harmony?” “No.”<milestone ed="P" unit="para" />“And therefore again one soul can have no greater amount of wickedness or virtue than another, if wickedness is discord and virtue harmony?” “It cannot.”<milestone ed="P" unit="para" />“Or rather, to speak exactly, Simmias,
</p></sp></body></text></group></text></TEI.2>