<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<TEI.2><text lang="en"><body><div1 type="book" n="7" org="uniform" sample="complete"><div2 type="section" n="516C" org="uniform" sample="complete">
          <p><lemma lang="greek" targOrder="U" from="ROOT" to="DITTO">τῷ ὀξύτατα καθορῶντι κτλ.</lemma>
            “Induction conceived as inference from particulars to particulars, its test
            being prediction (not explanation), and its method being association of images or
            unanalysed likenesses, by contiguity in co-existence or succession” Bosanquet.
            Plato is thinking chiefly of the empirical politician and political adviser, who
            foretells the future from the present and the past (cf. Thuc. I 22), but limits his
            intellectual horizon by his own experience, and knows nothing of the real determining
            causes of events. The vast majority of Athenian statesmen belonged in Plato's opinion to
            this category: see on V 473 C and VI 488 B.</p>
          <p><lemma lang="greek" targOrder="U" from="ROOT" to="DITTO">αὐτῶν</lemma> does not of course depend on <foreign lang="greek">πρότερα</foreign> (as D. and V. translate), but is a partitive genitive
            after <foreign lang="greek">ὅσα</foreign>. <pb n="94" /></p>
        </div2></div1></body></text></TEI.2>