Browsing named entities in The Daily Dispatch: June 30, 1862., [Electronic resource]. You can also browse the collection for June 14th, 1862 AD or search for June 14th, 1862 AD in all documents.

Your search returned 3 results in 2 document sections:

The Daily Dispatch: June 30, 1862., [Electronic resource], article 2 (search)
ed on Friday, June 13th, at 91 ⅝ @ 91¾ for money. The bullion in the Bank of England had decreased £450,000. Baring says the disposition to sell American stocks continues, and tends to depress prices. The Paris Bourse. Paris, June 14, 1862. The Bourse is firmer. The Rentes closed yesterday (June 13) at 68f. 65 The Liverpool cotton market. Liverpool. June 14, 1862. The Brokers' Circular reports the sales of the week at 84,000 bales. The market has been buoyant aJune 14, 1862. The Brokers' Circular reports the sales of the week at 84,000 bales. The market has been buoyant and prices are one-quarter to three-eighths of a penny higher. The sales to speculators have been 22,000 bales, and to exporters 23,000. The sales on Friday were 7,000 bales, including 3,500 to speculators and exporters, the market closing firm at the annexed quotations: Fair.Middling. Orleans14½13¼ Mobiles13¾13 Uplands13½12 ⅞ The stock in port is estimated at 289,000 bales, of which 92,000 are American. State of trade. There have been no sales in the Manchester mar
The Daily Dispatch: June 30, 1862., [Electronic resource], article 10 (search)
oregoing it is stated in the Picayune that Geo., W. Crage, first mate of the United States transport ship City of New York, Frank Newton, a private in the 15th Connecticut regiment, and Theo. Leih, (an assumed name,) New Orleans, implicated in the same affair, have also been sentenced to death. Jas. McDonald, an accessory, has been sentenced to hard labor, with ball and chain, for five years. Butler Refuses to recognize the British Consul. British Consulate, New Orleans, La, June 14, 1862. Sir: I beg to inform you that great doubt exists in the minds of British subjects, who, under the provisions of your order No. 41, are called upon to subscribe the oaths therein set forth, as to the consequence of compliance with the behests of that order. I would, therefore, respectfully request that you will inform me whether the oath prescribed in the first instance is intended, or, in your understanding, can be construed, to affect the natural allegiance they owe to the Gover