hide Matching Documents

The documents where this entity occurs most often are shown below. Click on a document to open it.

Document Max. Freq Min. Freq
Edward L. Pierce, Memoir and letters of Charles Sumner: volume 4 15 15 Browse Search
Cambridge History of American Literature: volume 3 (ed. Trent, William Peterfield, 1862-1939., Erskine, John, 1879-1951., Sherman, Stuart Pratt, 1881-1926., Van Doren, Carl, 1885-1950.) 2 2 Browse Search
Thomas Wentworth Higginson, Massachusetts in the Army and Navy during the war of 1861-1865, vol. 2 1 1 Browse Search
View all matching documents...

Browsing named entities in Edward L. Pierce, Memoir and letters of Charles Sumner: volume 4. You can also browse the collection for December 21st, 1870 AD or search for December 21st, 1870 AD in all documents.

Your search returned 15 results in 2 document sections:

Edward L. Pierce, Memoir and letters of Charles Sumner: volume 4, Chapter 55: Fessenden's death.—the public debt.—reduction of postage.— Mrs. Lincoln's pension.—end of reconstruction.—race discriminations in naturalization.—the Chinese.—the senator's record.—the Cuban Civil War.—annexation of San Domingo.—the treaties.—their use of the navy.—interview with the presedent.—opposition to the annexation; its defeat.—Mr. Fish.—removal of Motley.—lecture on Franco-Prussian War.—1869-1870. (search)
9-1870, Senate No. 284; Sumner's speeches, Dec. 21, 1870, and March 27, 1871, Works, vol. XIV. pp.avorite idea of his own. In the Senate, Dec. 21, 1870; Congressional Globe, p. 253. New York Trier's account may be found in his speeches, Dec. 21, 1870, Works, vol. XIV. pp. 125, 126; Congressially supported the treaty, said in debate, Dec. 21, 1870 (Cong. Globe, p. 266), when he mentioned are worthless. Sumner said in his speech, Dec. 21, 1870: I have heard it said that I assuredthis respect, and met no contradiction. Dec. 21, 1870, Works, vol. XIV. p. 127. He said:— e grounds of his opposition. In Senate, Dec. 21, 1870. Congressional Globe, p. 253. He said: anybody to say the contrary. （In Senate, Dec. 21, 1870, Congressional Globe, pp. 217, 218. 247. is was explained by the senator in debate, Dec. 21, 1870 (Congressional Globe, p. 247), as being sang in the main the effect of falsehood. Dec. 21, 1870. Congressional Globe, pp. 247, 253, 254. [2 more...]<
Edward L. Pierce, Memoir and letters of Charles Sumner: volume 4, Chapter 56: San Domingo again.—the senator's first speech.—return of the angina pectoris.—Fish's insult in the Motley Papers.— the senator's removal from the foreign relations committee.—pretexts for the remioval.—second speech against the San Domingo scheme.—the treaty of Washington.—Sumner and Wilson against Butler for governor.—1870-1871. (search)
exas resolution that it came under the power to admit States did not apply to San Domingo, which it was not proposed to admit as a State. In Senate, Dec. 20 and 21, 1870. Thurman, Congressional Globe, pp. 193, 250; Davis, Ibid., p. 195; Bayard, Ibid., p. 226. This idea of recurring to an act which had been repudiated as a precedut for the dignity of his office as President he would call the senator to account. Works, vol. XIV. p. 256; Harper's Weekly, Jan. 7, 1871; Boston Journal, Dec. 21, 1870. Threats also had been uttered by Babcock, which at one time he denied, and at another admitted. Attempts at reconcilement between the President and the sen aid, was able to keep the committee as before. The fact that the change was agitated found its way into the public journals and the debates in the Senate. Dec. 21, 1870, Congressional Globe, pp. 230, 241; March 10, 1871. Globe, pp. 39, 42, 47; New York Herald, Dec. 9, 1870; New York Evening Post, December 29. The Presiden