Browsing named entities in The Daily Dispatch: March 15, 1864., [Electronic resource]. You can also browse the collection for Adams or search for Adams in all documents.

Your search returned 2 results in 2 document sections:

The Daily Dispatch: March 15, 1864., [Electronic resource], article 1 (search)
Northern news — the Recognition rumor — rejoicing in Baltimore. Orange C. H., March 13. --The Washington Chronicle, of the 10th, contains Seward's celebrated letter of July 11th to Ministered Adams, relative to the English iron clads.--He says that the United States Government will be satisfied with the decision in the Alexandra case if affirmed by the highest courts. If affirmed, he says, it becomes the duty of Parliament to pace laws to prevent the fitting out of similar vessels. If this is not done, he suggests the possibility that United States vessels will be compelled to pursue vessels of this character even into British ports. This might lead to war, and Great Britain would be alone responsible. Mr. Davis. of Kentucky, has introduced in the United States Senate resolutions declaring that no negro, or person whose mother or grandmother was a negro, shall be citizen of the United States, or eligible to office; that Maine and Massachusetts shall constitute one St
The Daily Dispatch: March 15, 1864., [Electronic resource], European intelligence. (search)
the Government had promised to lay before the House the correspondence with the Federal Government relative to the seizure of Laird's rams, but had failed to do so.--He asked the reason of this discrepancy: Earl Russell--The statement of the noble Earl would be very striking if he had correctly remembered the facts of the discussion to which he alludes. The noble Earl has represented the case as if I had stated that the production of the correspondence to which he now alludes between Mr. Adams and me was dangerous to the public service, and as if I had been supported in that opinion by the Attorney General and the law officers of the Crown. As I recollect it, my statement was not that the production of the correspondence as relating to the United States and this country would be dangerous, but that the Attorney-General was of opinion that its production would lead to incomplete discussion in the House of Commons upon partial information, and therefore would be injurious to the