hide Matching Documents

The documents where this entity occurs most often are shown below. Click on a document to open it.

Document Max. Freq Min. Freq
The Daily Dispatch: March 17, 1863., [Electronic resource] 4 2 Browse Search
Wendell Phillips, Theodore C. Pease, Speeches, Lectures and Letters of Wendell Phillips: Volume 2 2 0 Browse Search
Harper's Encyclopedia of United States History (ed. Benson Lossing) 1 1 Browse Search
View all matching documents...

Your search returned 7 results in 3 document sections:

Harper's Encyclopedia of United States History (ed. Benson Lossing), Trials. (search)
aptured by Virgil A. Stewart in 1834, convicted, and sentenced to the penitentiary, where he died.] Spanish pirates (twelve in number), for an act of piracy on board the brig Mexican; trial at Boston; seven found guilty, five acquitted......Nov. 11-25, 1834 Heresy trial; Rev. Lyman Beecher, Presbyterian, before the presbytery and synod of Cincinnati, on charges preferred by Dr. Wilson, of holding and teaching Pelagian and Arminian doctrines; acquitted......June 9 et seq., 1835 Rev. Albert Barnes, Presbyterian, for heresies in Notes on the epistles to the Romans; tried and acquitted by presbytery of Philadelphia, June 30–July 8, 1835; condemned by the synod and suspended for six months, but acquitted by the general assembly......1836 Case of slave schooner Amistad......1839-40 Alexander McLeod, a Canadian, charged as an accomplice in burning the steamer Caroline in the Niagara River, and in the murder of Amos Durfee, is taken from Lockport to New York on habeas corpus, M
Wendell Phillips, Theodore C. Pease, Speeches, Lectures and Letters of Wendell Phillips: Volume 2, The Bible and the Church (1850). (search)
slave and into the heart of every legislator in the land! Our original attempt was this,--to show that the Bible and Christianity repudiate slavery. For a long time, in one unbroken phalanx, the so-called Christian Church denounced such a statement as infidelity; and from Maine to Georgia, from the Atlantic to the Mississippi, we had the unbroken testimony of the Church that the Bible was proslavery. Now the Church is divided. We have Henry Ward Beecher against Moses Stuart; we have Albert Barnes against Leonard Woods. The time was when the Recorder, and the religious press, claimed, with the New York Observer, that until you could mend the Constitution, you must mind it. We have urged our principles until we have scared up William H. Seward, and pitted him against Daniel Webster. [Great applause.] We have found persons who are willing to bewray not him that wandereth. And therefore it can never be often enough repeated, that when the question comes as to Christianity itself
Rev. Albert Barnes against Lincoln. --Rev. Albert Barnes, of Philadelphia, whom we supposed was the most determined of Abolitionists, opposes Mr. Lincoln's proclamation in all its aspects. He has recently published a sermon. "The Conditions of Peaces," in which he expresses the view that the "control of slavery, and all theRev. Albert Barnes, of Philadelphia, whom we supposed was the most determined of Abolitionists, opposes Mr. Lincoln's proclamation in all its aspects. He has recently published a sermon. "The Conditions of Peaces," in which he expresses the view that the "control of slavery, and all the laws regulating it, ought to be left to the States as such, in all respects, absolutely and exclusively" Mr. Barnes suggests that "New York city might not yet have traveled for beyond Canal street" if it had not been for cotton, and "if the South had not been willing that, on certain well known terms, their money affairs should bMr. Barnes suggests that "New York city might not yet have traveled for beyond Canal street" if it had not been for cotton, and "if the South had not been willing that, on certain well known terms, their money affairs should be in the hands of the merchants and brokers of New York"Upon another point Mr. Parson says a word, as follows: "In all my life I have defended freedom of speech, and fought many a battle for it. I have felt no restraint on that subject I feel none now. I believe that when freedom of speech shall be taken away the last hope of the