hide Matching Documents

The documents where this entity occurs most often are shown below. Click on a document to open it.

Document Max. Freq Min. Freq
Robert Underwood Johnson, Clarence Clough Buell, Battles and Leaders of the Civil War: The Opening Battles. Volume 1. 208 8 Browse Search
Benson J. Lossing, Pictorial Field Book of the Civil War. Volume 2. 177 1 Browse Search
Adam Badeau, Military history of Ulysses S. Grant from April 1861 to April 1865. Volume 1 175 3 Browse Search
Horace Greeley, The American Conflict: A History of the Great Rebellion in the United States of America, 1860-65: its Causes, Incidents, and Results: Intended to exhibit especially its moral and political phases with the drift and progress of American opinion respecting human slavery from 1776 to the close of the War for the Union. Volume II. 125 1 Browse Search
William Tecumseh Sherman, Memoirs of General William T. Sherman . 108 4 Browse Search
Harper's Encyclopedia of United States History (ed. Benson Lossing) 82 4 Browse Search
Official Records of the Union and Confederate Armies, Chapter XXII: Operations in Kentucky, Tennessee, North Mississippi, North Alabama, and Southwest Virginia. March 4-June 10, 1862. (ed. Lieut. Col. Robert N. Scott) 70 10 Browse Search
Philip Henry Sheridan, Personal Memoirs of P. H. Sheridan, General, United States Army . 69 1 Browse Search
James D. Porter, Confederate Military History, a library of Confederate States Military History: Volume 7.1, Tennessee (ed. Clement Anselm Evans) 41 1 Browse Search
Southern Historical Society Papers, Volume 32. (ed. Reverend J. William Jones) 33 3 Browse Search
View all matching documents...

Browsing named entities in Adam Badeau, Military history of Ulysses S. Grant from April 1861 to April 1865. Volume 1. You can also browse the collection for Don Carlos Buell or search for Don Carlos Buell in all documents.

Your search returned 89 results in 6 document sections:

e Missouri gunboats at the West demonstration in favor of Buell Smith reports capture of Fort Henry feasible Grant visitsortions of the loyal states, was assigned to Brigadier-General Don Carlos Buell, with headquarters at Louisville. In all These movements were made in favor of certain operations of Buell in the Department of the Cumberland. The object, said Halle threatened, and Brigadier-General George H. Thomas, one of Buell's subordinates, fought and won the battle of Mill Spring, iitary blunder. On the 6th of January, McClellan wrote to Buell: Halleck, from his own accounts, will not soon be in conditvement on Bowling Green. January 6th, McClellan wrote to Buell: My own general plans for the prosecution of the war, make en the two commanders. Halleck made no reply, but notified Buell on the 7th, General Grant expects to take Fort Donelson, atwas made to secure reenforcements . These were brought from Buell's command, and from that of Major-General Hunter, in Kansas
command Removes his headquarters to Savanna Buell ordered to reinforce him Buell's delay skirmince then, I have learned that the head of General Buell's column had arrived, on Monday evening. T, on the 27th. His object was to consult with Buell about the disposition of their troops, the jurassume the offensive. To counteract this, General Buell's command, was included in that of Hallecks marching in this direction; and on the 20th, Buell is at Columbia, and will move on Waynesboro wiver, until something further is heard from General Buell's command, and until full directions are g, are probably from sixty to eighty thousand. Buell, however, did not arrive till the 6th, or if ogth told at once. The rebels had not known of Buell's arrival, I accordingly established my headqpatch, that delays had been encountered by General Buell in his march from Columbia, and that his m doubt, however, of the immense advantage that Buell's arrival, when it did occur, afforded to Gran[51 more...]
ich they had no opportunities of knowing. General Buell and some of his officers, arriving late and in his shirt; that Grant was drunk, and that Buell was purposely dilatory. The country believed this campaign. To cap the climax, Pope and Buell were successively sent out after the enemy. BBuell was the rank. ing officer, and eventually took command. He formed a solid defensive line of ursuit was terminated by the 10th of June, and Buell was then sent towards Chattanooga, the great sth a large force for Chattanooga, to intercept Buell. And thus the great and tangible success, wt, and so have prevented the disasters both of Buell and Rosecrans's Chattanooga campaigns, and ford), were within the next two months ordered to Buell, who was stretching out slowly, like a huge, ue, Bragg, who had outmarched and outmanoeuvred Buell, reaching Chattanooga first, though starting l possible to take from Grant, had been sent to Buell, and the former was left to shift for himself,[2 more...]
he foundation and forerunner of final victories. As early as January, 1862, McClellan, then general-in-chief, wrote to Buell, who was in command in Kentucky: There are few things I have more at heart than the prompt movement of a strong column inive movement, however, was made in this direction, until after the evacuation of Corinth, in May, 1862, when Halleck sent Buell, with more than forty thousand men, across the states of Alabama and Tennessee, to Chattanooga. But, Bragg started for the same point, nearly as soon as Buell, and, by a series of skilful manoeuvres, compelled that general to fall back to the Ohio; after months of marching and fighting, Buell was further from his goal than when he set out from Corinth, and, accordinBuell was further from his goal than when he set out from Corinth, and, accordingly, was relieved. Rosecrans then took command of the Army of the Cumberland, with Chattanooga still as the objective point He manoeuvred from summer till winter, and from January again until June, fighting the battle of Murfreesboro on the first d
n, D. C., January 3, 1862. Major-General H. W. Halleck, commanding Department of Missouri: General: It is of the greatest importance that the rebel troops in western Kentucky be prevented from moving to the support of the force in front of General Buell. To accomplish this, an expedition should be sent up the Cumberland river (to act in concert with General Buell's command), of sufficient strength to defeat any force that may be brought against it. The gunboats should be supported by at leaGeneral Buell's command), of sufficient strength to defeat any force that may be brought against it. The gunboats should be supported by at least one, and perhaps two, divisions of your best infantry, taken from Paducah and other points from which they can best be spared; at the same time, such a demonstration should be made on Columbus as will prevent the removal of any troops from that place; and if a sufficient number have already been withdrawn, the place should be taken. It may be well, also, to make a feint on the Tennessee river, with a command sufficient to prevent disaster under any circumstances. As our success in Kentuc
he sun ever shone upon, preserved by their valor. By command of Major-General Grant. John A. Rawlins, Assistant Adjutant-General. General Grant to General Buell. headquarters, District of West Tennessee, Pittsburg, April 7, 1862. Major-General D. C. Buell, commanding Army of the Ohio: When I left the field this evening, my intention was to occupy the most advanced position possible for the night with the infantry engaged through the day, and follow up our success with cavalry and fresuded in your command, to be ready in the morning either to find if an enemy was in front, or to advance. U. S. Grant, Major-General. General Grant to General Buell headquarters, District of West Tennessee, Pittsburg, April 8, 1862. Major-General D. C. Buell, commanding Army of the Ohio: In making the reconnoissance ordered for this morning, none of the cavalry belonging to your command were directed to take part. I have directed, if the enemy are found retreating, information will be a