Browsing named entities in Abraham Lincoln, Stephen A. Douglas, Debates of Lincoln and Douglas: Carefully Prepared by the Reporters of Each Party at the times of their Delivery.. You can also browse the collection for S. A. Douglas or search for S. A. Douglas in all documents.

Your search returned 88 results in 4 document sections:

ngfield, Saturday evening, July 17, 1858. (Mr. Douglas was not present.) Fellow-Citizens: Anoth the State as candidates for the Senate. Senator Douglas is of world-wide renown. All the anxiouse. As to the principle, all were agreed. Judge Douglas voted with the Republicans upon that mattewas a fair emanation of the people or not, Judge Douglas with the Republicans and some Americans hato know what there is in the opposition of Judge Douglas to the Lecompton Constitution that entitle the votes of that one hundred and twenty, Judge Douglas's friends furnished twenty, to add to whicne by. I commented on it as wonderful that Judge Douglas could be ignorant of these facts, which ev singular if Mr. Clay cast his mantle upon Judge Douglas on purpose to have that compromise repealeits glory. One more thing. Last night Judge Douglas tormented himself with horrors about my dire point; on this Springfield speech which Judge Douglas says he has read so carefully. I expresse[18 more...]
Abraham Lincoln, Stephen A. Douglas, Debates of Lincoln and Douglas: Carefully Prepared by the Reporters of Each Party at the times of their Delivery., The following is the correspondence between the two rival candidates for the United States Senate: (search)
The following is the correspondence between the two rival candidates for the United States Senate: Mr. Lincoln to Mr. Douglas. Chicago, Ill., July 24, 1858. Hon. S. A. Douglas-My Dear Sir: Will it be agreeable to you to make an arrangement for you and myself to divide time, and address the same audiences the present canthis, is authorized to receive your answer ; and, if agreeable to you, to enter into the terms of such arrangement. Your obedient servant, A. Lincoln. Mr. Douglas to Mr. Lincoln. Chicago July 24, 1858. Hon. A. Lincoln--Dear Sir: Your note of this date, in which you inquire if it would be agreeable to me to make an arraf those places, I must insist upon you meeting me at the times specified. Very respectfully, your most obedient servant, S. A. Douglas. Mr. Lincoln to Mr. Douglas. Springfield, July 29, 1858. Hon S. A. Douglas — Dear Sir: Yours of the 24th in relation to an arrangement to divide time, and address the same audience is r
Abraham Lincoln, Stephen A. Douglas, Debates of Lincoln and Douglas: Carefully Prepared by the Reporters of Each Party at the times of their Delivery., First joint debate, at Ottawa, August 21, 1858. (search)
nd Judge Trumbull was to have the place of Judge Douglas. Now, all I have to say upon that subjectwith them, and I think Trumbull never had. Judge Douglas cannot show that either of us ever did havy, I have the means of knowing about that; Judge Douglas cannot have; and I know there is no substathe latter. I have reason to know that Judge Douglas knows that I said this, I think he has theand earns, he is my equal and the equal of Judge Douglas, and the equal of every living man. Noss the word State had in that connection. Judge Douglas knows. He put it there. He knows what he pd that other, and it should turn out to be Judge Douglas himself who made it, I hope he will reconsrt he has thought fit to ascribe to me. In Judge Douglas's speech of March 22d, 1858, which I hold to be made national, let us consider what Judge Douglas is doing every day to that end. In the fireve anything, when they once find out that Judge Douglas professes to believe it. Consider also the[30 more...]
Abraham Lincoln, Stephen A. Douglas, Debates of Lincoln and Douglas: Carefully Prepared by the Reporters of Each Party at the times of their Delivery., Second joint debate, at Freeport, August 27, 1858. (search)
Ladies and Gentlemen: On Saturday last, Judge Douglas and myself first met in public discussion.h. In the course of that opening argument Judge Douglas proposed to me seven distinct interrogatorntroductory to these interrogatories which Judge Douglas propounded to me at Ottawa, he read a set such an assemblage of men there, that when Judge Douglas read the resolutions, I really did not knor I could not bring myself to suppose that Judge Douglas could say what he did upon this subject wirther purpose than anything yet advanced. Judge Douglas did not make his statement upon that occasa good thing, and I really find nothing in Judge Douglas's course or arguments that is contrary to ar for it. After pointing this out, I tell Judge Douglas that it looks to me as though here was thenot appear in the ayes and noes. But does Judge Douglas reply amount to a satisfactory answer? [Cking a like charge against him. Go on, Judge Douglas. Mr. Douglas's speech. Ladies and Ge[7 more...]