Browsing named entities in Alfred Roman, The military operations of General Beauregard in the war between the states, 1861 to 1865. You can also browse the collection for H. W. Halleck or search for H. W. Halleck in all documents.

Your search returned 44 results in 8 document sections:

Tennessee River, against Fort Henry, or up the Cumberland, against Fort Donelson; and General Pope, with at least thirty thousand men, in Missouri, stood confronting Major-General Polk. The entire Federal forces, under the chief command of General Halleck, with headquarters at St. Louis, amounted to about one hundred and thirty thousand men. To oppose such a host, General Johnston stated that he had, at Bowling Green, some fourteen thousand effectives of all arms; at Forts Henry and Donelson mine on the former plan of operations, your army, threatened also in front and on the right flank by Buell's large army, will be in a very critical condition, and may be forced to take refuge on the south side of the Tennessee River. But should Halleck adopt the second plan re-. ferred to, the position at Columbus will then become no longer tenable for an army inferior in strength to that of the enemy, and must fall back to some central point, where it can guard the main railroads to Memphis,
a later period served with distinction in the Mexican War. General Grant, who, for a time after the capture of Fort Donelson, had been virtually suspended by General Halleck, for an alleged disobedience of orders, arrived on the 17th, and resumed command. Meanwhile, on the 14th, General Sherman's division, which had not been landneral Beauregard, about Corinth. The Federal general's torpor does not seem to have been disturbed until about the middle of March, when he was instructed by General Halleck—who had been assigned, on the 11th, to the command in chief—to unite his forces with those of General Grant, at Savannah, on the Tennessee River. This point the Cumberland, vol. i. p. 99. On the 15th Buell commenced his march, with five divisions, as already stated, to effect leisurely the junction ordered by General Halleck; while one division, the 7th, under General G. W. Morgan, went to East Tennessee, and another, the 3d, under General O. M. Mitchell, to pursue General Johnsto
ned no less than seven thousand men each, as is established by General Van Horne, in his History of the Army of the Cumberland, vol. i. p. 99, where the following passage is found: The 1st, 2d, 4th, 5th, and 6th divisions, commanded respectively by Brigadier-Generals Thomas, McCook, Nelson, Crittenden, and Wood, with a contingent force of cavalry, in all thirty-seven thousand effective men, constituted the main army, which, under the personal command of General Buell, was to join General Halleck in the projected movement against the enemy at Corinth, Mississippi. The total force of the Federals on both days amounted, therefore, to about seventy-two thousand men of all arms, and their losses were, according to official reports—in General Grant's army, 1437 killed, 5679 wounded, and 2934 prisoners; in General Buell's army, 236 killed, 1816 wounded, and 88 prisoners; making 1673 killed, 7495 wounded, and 3022 prisoners, or a grand total of 12,190. Thus the proportion of kill
commanding officers surprised by Beauregard's foolish attack. Generals Halleck, Grant, and Buell seem to have been equally unprepared for hiss march on the 31st, intending—having obtained the approval of General Halleck—to stop for cleaning up and rest at Waynesboro; he had not yetin good shape to meet a comrade army, obtained permission from General Halleck to stop for rest at Waynesboro. The army commander had also uuced than this project of stopping at Waynesboro, that neither General Halleck nor General Buell, at this time, thought that there was anythi . . A variety of facts support the assumption that neither General Halleck, General Grant, nor the division commanders on the field beyonemy would advance in offence from Corinth with full strength. General Halleck proposed to command the united armies in their advance upon Cois letter See Boynton, Sherman's Historical Raid, p. 30. to General Halleck, sent from Savannah, April 5th, he said: General Nelson'
tive operations were undertaken by General Pope against Fort Pillow, he was suddenly ordered to Pittsburg Landing by General Halleck, who had arrived there on the 11th, and had officially assumed command. This order was carried out; and on the 21stforces at and around the battle-field of Shiloh, to an aggregate of at least one hundred and twenty thousand men. General Halleck puts the number at one hundred and twenty-five thousand. General Force, in his book, often quoted by us, says one hu i. p. 251, says that the army must have numbered nearly one hundred thousand men. This was an error on the part of General Halleck; for he certainly had no need of reinforcements at that time, his army being in a state of complete inactivity. Gen to be presumed that General Pope's operations around New Madrid would have been abandoned; for twice, already, had General Halleck been on the point of recalling his expedition. Far as he was from the scene of action, General Beauregard's teleg
erals Cooper and E. K. Smith. would force General Halleck, who was plodding away slowly in his advaundred and twenty-five thousand men, with General Halleck, as first, and General Grant, as second, der, no doubt, to hurry on and anticipate General Halleck's advance against our forces, he determinents for an orderly retreat. Meantime, General Halleck had not ceased advancing his successive les forwarded after the event, telegraphed General Halleck on the 30th of May, at 1 o'clock A. M., aeral Pope's alleged pressing pursuit. Major-General Halleck's despatch of June 4th may particularlntered the place all had got off safely. General Halleck has thus achieved one of the most barren rland, Vol. i. pp. 128, 129. speaks of General Halleck's superior numbers at Corinth, and of hisonets, and refers to the field returns of General Halleck's forces at Corinth. disappeared from thele if pursued. Will write it soon, however. Halleck's despatch nearly all false. Retreat was a m[10 more...]
st night. I give you with pleasure the following views on your proposed operations from Tupelo, for I wish you the amplest success, both on your own and the country's account. You have evidently but one of four things to do. First, to attack Halleck at Corinth; second, to attack Buell at or about Chattanooga; third, to attack Grant at or about Memphis; fourth, to remain idle at Tupelo. From what you state the first is evidently inadmissible, and the last cannot be entertained for one mor of your present position at Tupelo. The third proposition would have afforded you some success, but not as brilliant and important in its results as the second one, if the newspapers will permit you to carry it successfully into effect; for Halleck and Buell, occupying the base of a long isosceles triangle, of which Mobile is the apex, could get to Chattanooga before you if they should become aware of your movements, and then you would have to contend again with superior forces, as usual t
t Nashville; for we must try to keep Buell away from us until we can get through with Grant and Halleck's other forces. I send you, herewith, my notes of reference, to give you a clear insight integard, Genl. Comdg. Headquarters Western Department, Corinth, Miss., May 20th, 1862. Major-Genl. H. W. Halleck, Comdg. U. S. Forces: General,—I have this day been informed by Brigadier-General Vhands, were rescued. These are the two thousand men untruthfully reported by Generals Pope and Halleck to their War Department as captured and paroled on that occasion. I desire to record that onrty and stores destroyed by us at Corinth, and General Pope's alleged pressing pursuit. Major-General Halleck's despatch of June 4th may particularly be characterized as disgracefully untrue. Possity on me. To aid him at all from here necessarily renders me too weak for the offensive against Halleck, with at least sixty thousand strongly intrenched in my front. With the country between us red