Browsing named entities in The Daily Dispatch: March 26, 1861., [Electronic resource]. You can also browse the collection for J. P. Harrison or search for J. P. Harrison in all documents.

Your search returned 3 results in 2 document sections:

The Daily Dispatch: March 26, 1861., [Electronic resource], article 1 (search)
substitute. Is the Committee ready for the question? Voices.--"Question — question." Mr. Wise asked if the motion in this form would preclude another motion to strike out and insert. The Chair.--Certainly not. Mr. Wilson, of Harrison, had something which he desired to offer. He moved that the Committee rise. The Chair.--The motion is not in order.--The Committee has resolved to sit till 2 o'clock. Mr. Scott, of Fauquier, desired to present some views to the Commiten upon the motion to strike out. Mr. Price, of Greenbrier, and Mr. Conrad, of Frederick, appealed to the member from Preston to withdraw his call for a division, which he consented to do. Mr. Clemens, of Ohio, said, as the gentle-from Harrison, who offered the competing proposition, was absent, he hoped the Committee would withdraw the substitute, by general consent. This course was objected to. Some interrogatories were here propounded by Mr. Wise as to which report of the
The Daily Dispatch: March 26, 1861., [Electronic resource], Evening session. (search)
y in the session, and now on the table, censuring Senators Mason and Hunter for their course in respect to the propositions. He hoped, since the evidence that had been adduced to-day that they were not acceptable to the Convention, that the mover would withdraw it, and introduce another, complimenting the Senators upon their action. He contended that Virginia ought no longer to be making propositions to the North, which had already turned a deaf ear to her entreaties. Mr. Carlile, of Harrison, said that years ago, in the National House of Representatives, he had the temerity to remark that those who voted in favor of the Kansas-Nebraska act would live to regret it. He would now say that those who voted against his substitute would live to regret it. He might, as in the former case, be subjected to years of obloquy, but would again trust to time to vindicate his position. He hoped gentlemen would make specifications. They had heaped abuse upon the propositions, but he had been