hide Matching Documents

The documents where this entity occurs most often are shown below. Click on a document to open it.

Document Max. Freq Min. Freq
Southern Historical Society Papers, Volume 16. (ed. Reverend J. William Jones) 16 0 Browse Search
View all matching documents...

Your search returned 16 results in 2 document sections:

Southern Historical Society Papers, Volume 16. (ed. Reverend J. William Jones), The Second Virginia regiment of cavalry, C. S. A. a tribute to its discipline and efficiency, and defiant Resolutions passed by it February 28th, 1865. (search)
ion and Democracy of the United States. Von Hoist. has announced that Brown's trial was not a fair and impartial one. Dr. Von Holst has written several valuable and able works on the institutions of this country, and has usually been careful and, fod protection of a fair trial were to be accorded the prisoners; and to show to the present generation of readers that Dr. Von Holst's conclusions are erroneous is partly the object of this article; the other object is to duly inform the generation , but there are people in the United States, unfortunately too many of them, who have fallen into the same error that Dr. Von Holst has, and it is to convince them, if possible, of their great mistake that we have given so much time to this point. t I have received on my trial. The testimony of this last and most important witness is commended to the fairness of Dr. Von Holst. It is not intended in this article to discuss the character or the motives of John Brown. This is left to futur
Southern Historical Society Papers, Volume 16. (ed. Reverend J. William Jones), chapter 1.39 (search)
ion and Democracy of the United States. Von Hoist. has announced that Brown's trial was not a fair and impartial one. Dr. Von Holst has written several valuable and able works on the institutions of this country, and has usually been careful and, fod protection of a fair trial were to be accorded the prisoners; and to show to the present generation of readers that Dr. Von Holst's conclusions are erroneous is partly the object of this article; the other object is to duly inform the generation , but there are people in the United States, unfortunately too many of them, who have fallen into the same error that Dr. Von Holst has, and it is to convince them, if possible, of their great mistake that we have given so much time to this point. t I have received on my trial. The testimony of this last and most important witness is commended to the fairness of Dr. Von Holst. It is not intended in this article to discuss the character or the motives of John Brown. This is left to futur