Browsing named entities in Comte de Paris, History of the Civil War in America. Vol. 1. (ed. Henry Coppee , LL.D.). You can also browse the collection for Hunter or search for Hunter in all documents.

Your search returned 23 results in 3 document sections:

Comte de Paris, History of the Civil War in America. Vol. 1. (ed. Henry Coppee , LL.D.), Book III:—the first conflict. (search)
efforts of Generals Tyler and Runyon and Colonels Hunter, Heintzelman, and Miles, who had been pla17th at the same time by Miles in front and by Hunter in flank. He intended afterwards to make a deeen turned. The flank attack was entrusted to Hunter's and Heintzelman's divisions, forming a corpshe flank movement of the main column formed by Hunter's and Heintzelman's forces, and intended for trded by a detachment of the enemy, as soon as. Hunter, taking the latter in flank, should have dislont he succeeded in forestalling the Federals. Hunter's first brigade, commanded by Burnside, being n hour, during which time the other brigade of Hunter's division, under Andrew Porter, hastens to gee were many killed and wounded on both sides. Hunter was among the first to be. struck down; and thed the trees signalled to him the movements of Hunter and the combat that was going on at Young's Bred the narrow roads followed in the morning by Hunter and Heintzelman on the other side of the river[2 more...]
Comte de Paris, History of the Civil War in America. Vol. 1. (ed. Henry Coppee , LL.D.), Book IV:—the first autumn. (search)
ivisions under the respective commands of Generals Hunter, Pope, Siegel, McKinstry, and Asboth, andities, on the 14th of October: 1st division,Hunter, at Tipton9,750 men. 2d divisionPope, at Geor difficulties of the route, as well as that of Hunter. At the same time, he had ordered Grant to mae President had recalled him and appointed General Hunter in his place. Being too imaginative to maetter opportunity. It is needless to say that Hunter promptly repudiated that instrument. Fremonion to find vent. On the evening of the 3d, Hunter not having yet rejoined the army, Fremont, at rge at Springfield. On the morning of the 4th Hunter sent out reconnoitring parties, who failed to his soldiers to obey his successor as himself, Hunter did not fail to perceive that there was much fn reorganizing the army of the Missouri, which Hunter had left him after a few days' command, exchanistrative service. As we have already stated, Hunter's retreat to Rolla had surrendered a great por
Comte de Paris, History of the Civil War in America. Vol. 1. (ed. Henry Coppee , LL.D.), Book V:—the first winter. (search)
leaving Fort Belknap, in Texas, the mail-carrier had no other guide than a small compass to direct him in finding out the stages marked by the whitened bones of the Anglo-Saxon emigrant or the Mexican adventurer. The two adversaries, one resting upon St. Louis, the other on the State of Arkansas, had to meet on this road whenever the aim of their campaigns was the possession of Missouri. Hostilities commenced west of the Mississippi about the same time as on the banks of the Tennessee. Hunter, after superseding Fremont, had left the army of the Missouri and taken command of the troops assembled in the State of Kansas. His mission was simply to hunt the guerillas, to protect the Unionists, and to secure them some measure of safety. He succeeded to a considerable extent, and restored some degree of order in that State, which, since its birth, had never been aught but a battlefield. In that part of Missouri situated north of the river of that name the Confederates still counte