hide Matching Documents

The documents where this entity occurs most often are shown below. Click on a document to open it.

Document Max. Freq Min. Freq
Comte de Paris, History of the Civil War in America. Vol. 3. (ed. Henry Coppee , LL.D.) 895 3 Browse Search
The Photographic History of The Civil War: in ten volumes, Thousands of Scenes Photographed 1861-65, with Text by many Special Authorities, Volume 3: The Decisive Battles. (ed. Francis Trevelyan Miller) 706 4 Browse Search
Benson J. Lossing, Pictorial Field Book of the Civil War. Volume 3. 615 1 Browse Search
Southern Historical Society Papers, Volume 7. (ed. Reverend J. William Jones) 536 38 Browse Search
Southern Historical Society Papers, Volume 5. (ed. Reverend J. William Jones) 465 11 Browse Search
Southern Historical Society Papers, Volume 4. (ed. Reverend J. William Jones) 417 7 Browse Search
Jubal Anderson Early, Ruth Hairston Early, Lieutenant General Jubal A. Early , C. S. A. 414 2 Browse Search
Robert Underwood Johnson, Clarence Clough Buell, Battles and Leaders of the Civil War. Volume 3. 393 5 Browse Search
General James Longstreet, From Manassas to Appomattox 376 16 Browse Search
Southern Historical Society Papers, Volume 11. (ed. Reverend J. William Jones) 369 33 Browse Search
View all matching documents...

Browsing named entities in Southern Historical Society Papers, Volume 37. (ed. Reverend J. William Jones). You can also browse the collection for Fitzhugh Lee or search for Fitzhugh Lee in all documents.

Your search returned 32 results in 4 document sections:

Southern Historical Society Papers, Volume 37. (ed. Reverend J. William Jones), General J. E. B. Stuart in the Gettysburg campaign. (search)
e long ago celebrated, among others, by General Fitzhugh Lee in his description of the Gettysburg Ca remarkable that Col. Mosby should include Gen. Fitz. Lee among those who have thrown the blame of the Gettysburg campaign, on Stuart. For Gen. Lee says: This officer has been unjustly criticised forbeing in front of Lee's army at Gettysburg, but Lee and Longstreet must be held responsible for hisMosby first impeaches the accuracy of both of Gen. Lee's Reports of the Battle of Gettysburg (of Julrtant statements made therein, viz.: 1. That Gen. Lee was in ignorance of Hooker's movements until his army approaching South Mountain; 2. That Gen. Lee then, and therefore, changed his plan and ordte east of South Mountain; 3. That it had been Lee's intention to concentrate at Harrisburg and th Federal Army. This serious impeachment of Gen. Lee's accuracy in regard to the particulars of hiaign, is largely based on a letter taken from Gen. Lee's Official Letter Book, and dated at Chambers[4 more...]
Southern Historical Society Papers, Volume 37. (ed. Reverend J. William Jones), chapter 1.33 (search)
ies. As I had no place for him as an officer, I gave him a rifle and ordered him in the ranks. If he expected to perform proper service that was the place for him. At this he took offense, and as my duties called me imperatively elsewhere at the moment, I did not place him under arrest, as I should have done. I should never have replied to General Maury's article and should have passed it by in silence, for General Maury had no just foundations for his criticisms, but meeting with General Fitzhugh Lee, who was a warm friend of mine, he, knowing all the circumstances of the engagement at the bridge, advised me not to let Gen. Maury's article go unnoticed, and I replied, though then as now, I think we had enough to do to fight the enemy. Having been wounded and captured nearby the intrepid Armistead in the heroic charge where he led the remnant of Pickett's Division over the stone wall at Gettysburg; having been honored with this independant command after eight months confinement
Southern Historical Society Papers, Volume 37. (ed. Reverend J. William Jones), chapter 1.34 (search)
At first I declined them, reminding him of General Lee's strict orders in regard to such things. f Ohio. I have never heard personally from Governor Lee since. I then rode back to General Early. stance to their appeal. We did not hear of General Lee's appearance about our lines, I should thinis. Then it became rumored amongst us that General Lee was on the grounds. Of course, I knew nothay. Gordon, Early, Ewell (?), Longstreet and Lee. I do not think General Gordon ever intendedhalt was accompanied by an explanation that General Lee was several miles away, and did not wish to He then goes on with the old story of what General Lee is said to have said about what would have General Ewell defended. But what does General Lee say? General Ewell was therefore instructet reach Gettysburg until a late hour. Now, General Lee left ie entirely to the discretion of his ss not entirely magnanimity upon the part of General Lee and General Ewell was very much influenced [2 more...]
Southern Historical Society Papers, Volume 37. (ed. Reverend J. William Jones), chapter 1.35 (search)
re the Oakwood Memorial Association on May 9, (8 P. M.), 1909, by Rev. R. A. Goodwin, the rector, Lee and Pickett Camps and committees from Hollywood and other memorial associations being present. country. And therefore, from the time he began in Belmont until he accomplished the surrender of Lee, at Appomattox, he fought not cities, not points of strategy, but he fought the enemy, and he fo wearing out the opposition? The inference would naturally be drawn that he fought the armies of Lee and Johnston; but how? Lee was defending Richmond and Petersburg, and Johnston was holding pointLee was defending Richmond and Petersburg, and Johnston was holding points of strategy; and we read: He fought not cities, not points of strategy—he fought the enemy! Who were the enemy? Some of the enemy were prisoners of war, nearly starving amid plenty, while a greatd, starving heroes, eating parched corn, march from Richmond to Appomattox. And the surrender of Lee is accomplished! This was the very genius of war that suppressed the rebellion. Yes, they fough