Browsing named entities in The Daily Dispatch: may 29, 1862., [Electronic resource]. You can also browse the collection for M. Mercier or search for M. Mercier in all documents.

Your search returned 6 results in 2 document sections:

The Daily Dispatch: may 29, 1862., [Electronic resource], article 4 (search)
fact is asserted to be tree on very high authority. No one doubts that proposals of intervention have again been made by the Imperial Government to the Cabinet of London, and so far acceded to that instructions on that basis have been sent to M. Mercier by the Foreign Minister. Hence the journey of M. Mercier to Richmond The presence of M. de Moray in England is also attributed to the same cause. No doubt the material pressure on the Government grows every hour more severs. The aspect of thM. Mercier to Richmond The presence of M. de Moray in England is also attributed to the same cause. No doubt the material pressure on the Government grows every hour more severs. The aspect of things looks very ominous for the North, so far as Europe is concerned, and causes much anxiety here to the friends of America and the Union. The latest. Liverpool., 6th, P. M.--Parliament is engaged on the educational question. Government views are generally accepted. The Morning Herald argues from the reports of M. Mercler's visit to Richmond, that the beginning of the end is not far distant. It says that France and England suffer more than neutrals over suffered from any contest,
The Daily Dispatch: may 29, 1862., [Electronic resource], Foreign intervention. (search)
intervention. the report of Mr. Geoffrey, first Secretary of the French Legation; as taken to Paris — views of M. Mercier. The following are extract from a letter, dated Washington; May 22, published in the New York Times: Prated to some of his friends in Washington the result of his observations in Richmond, where he had been in company of Count Mercier. Mr. Geoffrey was of opinion that the rebels may be conquered may suffer defeat upon defeat, but that they will never, he sent Mr. Mercler to ascertain which, of the American or French representative's report, was the correct one. Mr. Mercier had several conversations with the representatives of the Confederate States in Richmond, particularly with Mr. Benjamk, that while Mr. Disraell asserts that the most serious differences and misunderstandings exist between Lord Lyons and M. Mercier at Washington about American affairs. Lord Palmerston, on the contrary, represents them as billing and cooing like a p